add FAQs about collation for JDBC connections #20848
Conversation
qiancai
added
area/sql-infra
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @qiancai, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request adds a FAQ entry about collation for JDBC connections. The PR is translated from a Chinese version of the documentation. Only one file was changed, temp.md, with the addition of a single line of text.
Highlights
- New FAQ Entry: Adds a new FAQ entry regarding collation for JDBC connections to the documentation.
- Translation: This PR is a translation from the Chinese documentation.
Changelog
- temp.md
- Added a line of text: 'This is a test file.'
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request adds a test file. The change is simple and straightforward. I have added a minor comment regarding the file content.
Merge Readiness
The pull request is ready to be merged. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and other reviewers should review and approve this code before merging.
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
the
size/XS
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
size/M
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds a new FAQ section about collation for JDBC connections. The content is well-organized and provides useful information for TiDB users. However, some minor improvements can be made to enhance clarity and adherence to the style guide.
Summary of Findings
- Inconsistent terminology: The phrase "What collation is used in a JDBC connection" is used in a heading, while "What collation is used for a JDBC connection" is used in the body. Consistent terminology should be used throughout the document.[^1]
- Markdown style: There are missing blank lines before and after the table. [^2]
- Sentence case for headings: The heading "Collation used in JDBC connections" should be in sentence case.
Merge Readiness
The pull request is almost ready for merging. Addressing the identified issues, especially those related to clarity and consistency, will further improve the quality of the documentation. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that another reviewer gives their approval after the changes are made.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…o add-collation-faq-20255
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
the
area/develop
Co-authored-by: Aolin <[email protected]>
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
Co-authored-by: Aolin <[email protected]>
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
size/L
qiancai
added
needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5
|
/approve |
|
@bb7133: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/retest |
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
size/M
qiancai
added
the
do-not-merge/hold
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: qiancai The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
qiancai
removed
the
do-not-merge/hold
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
First-time contributors' checklist
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions (in Chinese).
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?