Skip to content

Conversation

@ferhatelmas
Copy link
Contributor

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

bug fix

What is the current behavior?

type mismatch

What is the new behavior?

correct serialization

Additional context

fixes #28

@ferhatelmas ferhatelmas requested review from a team as code owners December 10, 2025 03:08
mandarini
mandarini previously approved these changes Dec 15, 2025
@mandarini mandarini self-assigned this Dec 15, 2025
@mandarini
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for your PR @ferhatelmas ! Can you please update with my comment, and I will merge!

@mandarini mandarini added the next major This will go into the next major release, since it contains breaking changes label Dec 16, 2025
@mandarini mandarini self-requested a review December 16, 2025 10:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

next major This will go into the next major release, since it contains breaking changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Some types don't conform to SPEC

2 participants