Skip to content

correctly take unstable-features #128

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 23, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Emilgardis
Copy link
Member

fixes #127

@Emilgardis Emilgardis requested a review from a team as a code owner August 15, 2022 12:42
@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @ryankurte

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

ci errors are one of the issues with not having a lockfile :), we could specify --locked to avoid this.

can bump MSRV

@therealprof
Copy link
Contributor

can bump MSRV

I think that's probably the way to go...

@Emilgardis Emilgardis force-pushed the fix/issue127 branch 2 times, most recently from da08b60 to 9810486 Compare August 15, 2022 15:14
@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

done, we should get a release out after this too

therealprof
therealprof previously approved these changes Aug 15, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@therealprof therealprof left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks.

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2022
128: correctly take unstable-features r=therealprof a=Emilgardis

fixes #127


Co-authored-by: Emil Gardström <[email protected]>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Aug 15, 2022

Timed out.

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

interesting.

bors retry

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2022
128: correctly take unstable-features r=therealprof a=Emilgardis

fixes #127


Co-authored-by: Emil Gardström <[email protected]>
@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

bors cancel

the bors matrix is looking for version number

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Aug 15, 2022

Canceled.

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

bors try

should fail

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Aug 15, 2022

try

Build failed:

Comment on lines 75 to 82
if: always()
steps:
- name: Result
run: |
jq -C <<< "${needs}"
"$(jq -r 'all(.result as $result | (["success"] | contains([$result])))' <<< "${needs}")"
env:
needs: ${{ toJson(needs) }}
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

technically, this is not needed. Could simply be

Suggested change
if: always()
steps:
- name: Result
run: |
jq -C <<< "${needs}"
"$(jq -r 'all(.result as $result | (["success"] | contains([$result])))' <<< "${needs}")"
env:
needs: ${{ toJson(needs) }}
steps:
- name: Result
run: exit 0

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

bumping msrv due to rust-lang/rust#105167 on macos

Copy link
Member

@adamgreig adamgreig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks, lgtm!

bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jan 23, 2023

Build succeeded:

  • conclusion

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

-Z unstable flags not passed to build command
5 participants