Skip to content

Conversation

@sharafat-10xEngineers
Copy link
Contributor

@sharafat-10xEngineers sharafat-10xEngineers commented Dec 14, 2022

PR for the single lane support

This PR focuses on single lane with VLEN = 128, 256, 512. Also Default rv64uv tests are not ready to check the functionality for single lane configuration.

Changelog

Changed

  • Changes from this PR handle single lane configuration in ara slide unit and lane sequencer.
  • Handle NrLanes == 1 case in the ara sequencer as there is no lane desynchronization problem in case of single lane.
  • Corrected vector length calculation for single lane by handling NrLanes == 1 case in lane sequencer where division of vector length is not required.
  • Corrected vector start calculation for single lane by handling NrLanes == 1 case in lane_sequencer where division of vstart is not required.
  • Handle a single lane case in the mask unit.
  • Fixes datapath for slide instructions and NrLanes == 1 case to support single lane configuration.
  • Update address generation logic of strided and indexed load store for AXIDataWidth = 32 when loading element of SEW=64.

Checklist

  • Automated tests pass
  • Changelog updated
  • Code style guideline is observed

@sharafat-10xEngineers sharafat-10xEngineers changed the title Single lane [HW] Add support for single lane configuration Dec 14, 2022
@fatimasaleem
Copy link

Hi @mp-17 can you enable the CI for this PR?

@mp-17
Copy link
Contributor

mp-17 commented Dec 15, 2022

Thank you for opening this precious PR! I attach below the original draft work for reference (I closed the original PR):
#75

@sharafat-10xEngineers sharafat-10xEngineers force-pushed the single_lane branch 2 times, most recently from 3bb509b to cadc92b Compare December 20, 2022 08:07
@sharafat-10xEngineers
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @mp-17, Kindly enable the latest CI for this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants