-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
OCPBUGS-54780: Fix issue where console operator orphans custom logo configmaps in openshift-console namespace #978
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@TheRealJon: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54780, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/hold Wait for #963 |
f549608
to
828381a
Compare
828381a
to
40e1f03
Compare
/jira refresh |
@TheRealJon: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54780, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
40e1f03
to
bb18d11
Compare
/retest |
…onfigmaps in openshift-console namespace
bb18d11
to
ab68bff
Compare
/hold cancel |
klog.V(4).Infof("%#v", configMapNames) | ||
|
||
errors := []string{} | ||
if len(co.trackables.customLogoConfigMaps) > 0 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this does not seem to be right,cause we will be unsyncing on each sync loop run, except the first one, which will set the trackables
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah this was intentional. On every sync loop we:
- unsync all configmaps from the previous loop
- resync all configmaps for the current loop
- set trackables.customLogoConfigMaps to configmaps from current loop
This means that if the list of configmaps for the previous loop and the current loop are the same, the net result is that we just continue syncing the same configmaps.
/lgtm |
@jhadvig: Overrode contexts on behalf of jhadvig: ci/prow/e2e-aws-console, ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/jira refresh The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity. |
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54780, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@TheRealJon: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@TheRealJon: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54780, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/label tide/merge-method-squash |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jhadvig, TheRealJon The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Overriding the flaking OVN test |
@jhadvig: Overrode contexts on behalf of jhadvig: ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@TheRealJon: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@TheRealJon: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54780: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54780 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@TheRealJon: new pull request created: #985 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: openshift-enterprise-console-operator |
No description provided.