Add new type challenge based on scala's tupled function #130
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…'s 'tupled' function
stewartHutchins
force-pushed
the
new-type-challenge-tupled
branch
from
912e594 to
8d85844
Compare
|
I have just noticed that adding a return type to the function signature is optional - I imagine this is a problem :/ |
laike9m
reviewed
Jun 7, 2025
| """ | ||
| TODO: | ||
|
|
||
| Define an "tupled" function that accepts a function and returns a function with some arguments in the form of a tuple. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The description is not so clear on what it expects user to do, and why
I'd suggest give it an example or put it in a more practical scene
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was playing with Python the other day, I tried to implement Scala's "tupled" function.
I thought it had some potential to make a good type challenge.
I think the TODO comment at the top might need some additional clarification.