Skip to content

Adding conformance report for Kubvernor #1316

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
13 changes: 13 additions & 0 deletions conformance/reports/v0.5.0/gateway/kubvernor/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
# Kubvernor Rust Gateway

## Table of Contents

| Extension Version Tested | Profile Tested | Implementation Version | Mode | Report |
|--------------------------|----------------|------------------------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| v0.5.1 | Gateway | [0.1.1](https://github.com/kubvernor/kubvernor/releases/tag/0.1.1) | default | [Conformance report](./kubvernor-inference-conformance-output-0.1.1.yaml) |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

## Reproduce

To reproduce Kubvernor conformance report follow [README](https://github.com/kubvernor/kubvernor/blob/0.1.1/README.md)

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
GatewayAPIInferenceExtensionVersion: v0.5.1
apiVersion: gateway.networking.k8s.io/v1
date: "2025-08-06T21:32:49+01:00"
gatewayAPIChannel: UNDEFINED
gatewayAPIVersion: UNDEFINED
Comment on lines +4 to +5
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What version of Gateway API CRDs did you run this against?

@zetxqx can you take a look to confirm we're automatically populating this?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

++. that field should be required (we cannot leave UNDEFINED).
automation to populate it would be great.
a user can't know which version to use to get this to work.

implementation:
contact:
- [email protected]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lots of implementations also just link to an OSS repo to file an issue if you want to avoid some email spam - up to you.

organization: kubvernor
project: kubvernor
url: https://github.com/kubvernor/kubvernor
version: 0.1.1
kind: ConformanceReport
mode: default
profiles:
- core:
result: success
statistics:
Failed: 0
Passed: 9
Skipped: 0
name: Gateway
summary: Core tests succeeded.