-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Support custom field metadata in UDF #13458
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ use datafusion_common::{not_impl_err, ExprSchema, Result}; | |
use datafusion_expr_common::interval_arithmetic::Interval; | ||
use std::any::Any; | ||
use std::cmp::Ordering; | ||
use std::collections::HashMap; | ||
use std::fmt::Debug; | ||
use std::hash::{DefaultHasher, Hash, Hasher}; | ||
use std::sync::Arc; | ||
|
@@ -216,6 +217,15 @@ impl ScalarUDF { | |
self.inner.is_nullable(args, schema) | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Returns the field metadata for this function. | ||
pub fn metadata( | ||
&self, | ||
args: &[Expr], | ||
schema: &dyn ExprSchema, | ||
) -> HashMap<String, String> { | ||
self.inner.metadata(args, schema) | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Invoke the function with `args` and number of rows, returning the appropriate result. | ||
/// | ||
/// See [`ScalarUDFImpl::invoke_batch`] for more details. | ||
|
@@ -477,6 +487,15 @@ pub trait ScalarUDFImpl: Debug + Send + Sync { | |
true | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Returns the field metadata for this function. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think a more detailed explanation would be useful for someone adding a new UDF to know why this method exists and what use case it is trying to solve. Without looking at this PR it's pretty opaque. |
||
fn metadata( | ||
&self, | ||
_args: &[Expr], | ||
_schema: &dyn ExprSchema, | ||
) -> HashMap<String, String> { | ||
HashMap::new() | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Invoke the function on `args`, returning the appropriate result | ||
/// | ||
/// The function will be invoked passed with the slice of [`ColumnarValue`] | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feels similar in usecase to #13290 -- if we merged #13290 would that solve your usecase?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like not. This pr is for supporting custom metadata when converting scalar function expr to schema field during planing.