docs(autotrain): continuous-openui-scheduled-h2k9wp c1-c4 closeout (all non-positive) - #1483
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 45 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdded four 2026-08-08 continuous OpenUI screening records for campaigns c1–c4. The records include JSON and Markdown results, README and model-card notes, checkpoint paths, fixture-only status, non-ship outcomes, and no-bump version provenance. ChangesContinuous OpenUI screening
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
…seout (non-positive, fixture insufficient_n) Cycle 1 (campaign continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-schedu-c1d66fca-c1): control/bounds arms complete honest ship-gate evaluation (no decode-timeout this session, unlike prior loops gmyilq/fe71636 on slower sandboxes) but structural_similarity delta is null (0.0575 both arms) and n=3 < required 20 -- non-positive per sdlc autotrain-iteration-delivery gate. No stack layer.
…seout (non-positive, decode-timeout measurement_incomplete) Cycle 2 (campaign continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-schedu-c1d66fca-c2): control/component-plan arms hit decode_timeout_count=3/3 (compiler_ms_mean ~34.7-34.8s vs the 12s per-record screening budget) -- the same decode-capacity gap documented on loops gmyilq and fe71636. First occurrence on this loop (h2k9wp), not yet the repeated-hard-block threshold. Infrastructure diagnosis, not model attribution. No stack layer.
…seout (non-positive, structural_similarity null delta) Cycle 3 (campaign continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-schedu-c1d66fca-c3): control/bounds arms complete without decode timeout this cycle (compiler_ms_mean ~9.1-10.0s, under the 12s screening budget). Both arms score structural_similarity=0.190833 identically -- null primary delta, n=3 insufficient for a ship claim. Efficiency_win_quality_held residual noted (mpr_per_ms +10%) but not positive per the quality-aware tradeoff gate since the declared primary metric shows no movement. No stack layer.
…seout (non-positive, efficiency gain below minimum) Cycle 4 (campaign continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-schedu-c1d66fca-c4): control/component-plan arms complete (decode timeout recurred on this heavier knob: compiler_ms_mean ~32.3-32.8s, but this arm still finished within the sandbox's actual wall budget this run). mpr_per_ms improved 1.6%, under the 5% minimum-effect gate; structural_similarity identical across arms (0.4167). Non-positive. No stack layer.
fb1df44 to
4d763a0
Compare
2 participants
Summary
Scheduled
/autotraincontinuous-loop session (loop-idcontinuous-openui-scheduled-h2k9wp), run perautotrain+sdlcautotrain-iteration-delivery. Ran 4 supervised screening cycles against fixturewf_smoke_v2(control vs. a rotating candidate arm: bounds → component-plan → bounds → component-plan), each under the repo-wideMAX_RUN_MINUTES=3wall cap on this CPU-only sandbox....c1d66fca-c1, control/bounds): honest ship-gate evaluation completed cleanly (no decode timeout,compiler_ms_mean~5.0-5.1s/record).structural_similarityidentical across arms (0.0575) — null primary delta,n=3insufficient for a ship claim....c1d66fca-c2, control/component-plan): hit the decode-capacity blocker previously documented on loopsgmyilqandfe71636—decode_timeout_count=3/3both arms (compiler_ms_mean~34.7-34.8s vs. the 12s per-record screening budget). Infrastructuremeasurement_incomplete, not model attribution. First occurrence on this loop, not a repeated-hard-block....c1d66fca-c3, control/bounds): completed without timeout (compiler_ms_mean~9.1-10.0s).structural_similarityidentical (0.190833) — null delta. Anefficiency_win_quality_heldresidual (mpr_per_ms+10%) was logged for offline mining but is not a "positive" result under the quality-aware tradeoff gate since the primary metric didn't move....c1d66fca-c4, control/component-plan): completed (decode cost recurred, ~32.3-32.8s/record, but fit the cycle's actual wall budget this time).mpr_per_msimproved 1.6%, under the 5% minimum-effect gate;structural_similarityidentical (0.4167).Per
sdlcautotrain-iteration-delivery, none of the four cycles meet the positive-result gate (primary metric win / ship-quality win / executable unblock) — all are fixtureinsufficient_nand/or null primary deltas. No stack layer opened. This PR carries only the iron-law documentation (docs/design/*-results.{md,json}for each cycle) and the requireddocs/MODEL_CARD.md/README.mdcontinuous-autotrain provenance notes, each backed by ano-bump:entry insrc/slm_training/resources/versions.jsonforharness.experiments.slm228_spectral_disposition(behavior-neutral doc stubs,verify_version_stamps --checkpasses).No harness/model/eval code changed this session — pure fixture-scale documentation of non-positive screening cycles, matching the established pattern for non-positive continuous-loop sessions on this repo.
Test plan
python -m scripts.verify_version_stamps --checkpasses for every commit (pre-commit hook enforced)tests/test_scripts/test_verify_checkpoint_references.py+tests/test_versioningshards (all green)python -m scripts.autoresearch status --loop-id continuous-openui-scheduled-h2k9wp --matrix --last 5printed after every cycle (see commit messages / campaign JSON underdocs/design/)Generated by Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit