Skip to content

docs(autotrain): continuous-openui-scheduled-r7m3xz c1-c3 closeout (all non-positive) - #1513

Merged
Tyler-R-Kendrick merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
claude/great-dirac-3gy8tu
Aug 9, 2026
Merged

docs(autotrain): continuous-openui-scheduled-r7m3xz c1-c3 closeout (all non-positive)#1513
Tyler-R-Kendrick merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
claude/great-dirac-3gy8tu

Conversation

@Tyler-R-Kendrick

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Second round of the same scheduled /autotrain continuous-loop session (loop-id continuous-openui-scheduled-r7m3xz, following #1483 which merged), run per autotrain + sdlc autotrain-iteration-delivery on origin/main's new tip after #1483/#1482/#1485 landed. 3 supervised screening cycles against fixture wf_smoke_v2 (control vs. rotating bounds/component-plan arms), each under MAX_RUN_MINUTES=3.

  • c1 (...a8e59439-c1, control/bounds): clean run, no decode timeout (compiler_ms_mean ~4.8-5.3s/record). structural_similarity identical across arms (0.0575) — null primary delta.
  • c2 (...a8e59439-c2, control/component-plan): hit the same decode-capacity blocker documented across four independent loops now (h2k9wp c2, gmyilq, fe71636, and this one) — compiler_ms_mean ~34.7-34.8s vs. the 12s per-record screening budget. Infrastructure measurement_incomplete.
  • c3 (...a8e59439-c3, control/bounds): clean run (compiler_ms_mean ~9.5-10.1s). structural_similarity identical (0.190833, matching round 1's c3 exactly — same fixture/seed/knob). Efficiency win (+13.4% mpr_per_ms) logged but not positive since the primary metric didn't move.

Per sdlc autotrain-iteration-delivery, none of the three cycles meet the positive-result gate (fixture insufficient_n, null primary deltas throughout). No stack layer. This PR carries only the iron-law documentation (docs/design/*-results.{md,json}) plus the required docs/MODEL_CARD.md / README.md provenance notes and their no-bump: versions.json entries for harness.experiments.slm228_spectral_disposition — this round the continuous driver's self-heal closeout committed all of this automatically in one pass per cycle (no manual version-stamp intervention needed, unlike round 1 in #1483).

No harness/model/eval code changed this session.

Test plan

  • python -m scripts.verify_version_stamps --check passes for every commit (pre-commit hook enforced)
  • Each cycle's pre-commit hook ran the associated tests/test_scripts/test_verify_checkpoint_references.py + tests/test_versioning shards (all green)
  • python -m scripts.autoresearch status --loop-id continuous-openui-scheduled-r7m3xz --matrix --last 5 printed after every cycle
  • No model/ship-gate claim is made — all three cycles are fixture-scale screening only, honestly documented as non-positive

Generated by Claude Code

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
slm-training Ready Ready Preview Aug 9, 2026 4:06am

Request Review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Tyler-R-Kendrick, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 44 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 2187a6f7-c382-4c4a-9f80-58c1e64266c2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d1b3ff5 and 6dcf07d.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • README.md
  • docs/MODEL_CARD.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-schedu-a8e59439-c1-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-schedu-a8e59439-c1-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-schedu-a8e59439-c2-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-schedu-a8e59439-c2-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-schedu-a8e59439-c3-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-schedu-a8e59439-c3-results.md
  • src/slm_training/resources/versions.json

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

autotrain added 3 commits August 8, 2026 23:05
…uous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-schedu-a8e59439-c1 closeout
…uous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-schedu-a8e59439-c2 closeout
…uous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-schedu-a8e59439-c3 closeout
@Tyler-R-Kendrick
Tyler-R-Kendrick force-pushed the claude/great-dirac-3gy8tu branch from 9010926 to 6dcf07d Compare August 9, 2026 04:05
@Tyler-R-Kendrick
Tyler-R-Kendrick merged commit cfdae94 into main Aug 9, 2026
1 of 3 checks passed
@Tyler-R-Kendrick
Tyler-R-Kendrick deleted the claude/great-dirac-3gy8tu branch August 9, 2026 04:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant