-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 276
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate old db #1053
Deprecate old db #1053
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1053 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 79.36% 81.29% +1.93%
==========================================
Files 19 20 +1
Lines 1231 1203 -28
Branches 183 176 -7
==========================================
+ Hits 977 978 +1
+ Misses 254 225 -29 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't fully check if all the removed strings were removed from the translation, but overall seems good to go!
@@ -144,26 +130,12 @@ function importDatabaseFromFile(filename) | |||
} | |||
else | |||
{ | |||
assert(entry.type === 'flexible'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we write something on the test that hit this assert?
I have solved merge conflicts here and the issues raised on #1095 , so I'm closing this PR |
Related issue
Closes #935.
Context / Background
The old database format (fixed in 4 entries) is in deprecation since may of 2021, as we move with other features, it's time to remove any mention/handling of such database.
What change is being introduced by this PR?
Removed related code and unnecessary strings.
How will this be tested?
Hopefully with the CI. :)