Configure codespell pre-commit hook for spell checking
#152
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
arjxn-py
force-pushed
the
pre-commit-codespell
branch
from
7d3088d to
37d104d
Compare
arjxn-py
changed the title
codespell hookcodespell pre-commit hook for spell checking
|
I had to make the initial pass in |
|
Since it doesn't work with pre-commit, should i try creating a custom workflow instead? |
jtpio
approved these changes
Sep 11, 2024
Yes, it'd be nice to add a note for the same. Happy to do so. Thanks :) |
|
Done @jtpio |
|
Hi @jtpio, just a gentle ping. |
|
@arjxn-py Thanks for your PR |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR introduces the codespell pre-commit hook to automatically check and fix spelling mistakes across the codebase. It also includes custom configurations for word corrections and exclusions.
Discussed in #147
cc: @jtpio