Skip to content

[16.0] add base_external_system_ms_client_assertion #289

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 23 commits into
base: 16.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

NL66278
Copy link

@NL66278 NL66278 commented May 14, 2024

No description provided.

@NL66278 NL66278 force-pushed the 16.0-add-base_external_system_ms_client_assertion branch from e22688b to c458b29 Compare May 15, 2024 14:36
Basic authentication is no oauth at all and fully handled by base_external_system_http.
@NL66278 NL66278 force-pushed the 16.0-add-base_external_system_ms_client_assertion branch from c9145b2 to ea7dd5f Compare May 22, 2024 08:06
@NL66278 NL66278 force-pushed the 16.0-add-base_external_system_ms_client_assertion branch from 5efebde to 1155011 Compare May 29, 2024 10:18
In some installations, especially odoo.sh, it is not possible for the Odoo admin to put
files like the private key in the filesystem. In that case the private key can be pasted
into the private key field, and the value will be used and not interpreted as a filename.
@NL66278 NL66278 force-pushed the 16.0-add-base_external_system_ms_client_assertion branch from 1155011 to 990b53f Compare May 29, 2024 12:12
@NL66278 NL66278 changed the title [WIP][16.0] add base_external_system_ms_client_assertion [16.0] add base_external_system_ms_client_assertion Oct 7, 2024
@NL66278
Copy link
Author

NL66278 commented Oct 7, 2024

For some time now successfully running in production at large customer.

SiesslPhillip pushed a commit to grueneerde/OCA-server-backend that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
Syncing from upstream OCA/server-backend (16.0)
Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Mar 23, 2025
@NL66278
Copy link
Author

NL66278 commented Mar 24, 2025

@thomaspaulb Could you add a no stale label here?

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Mar 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants