My contribution

[raunzw]

Refactored app.js to enhance error handling and improve overall structure for better readability and maintainability. Added appropriate error responses for edge cases and reorganized middleware and routes for clarity.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved error handling during server startup to ensure that initialization errors are logged and the process exits safely.

[keploy]

No significant changes currently retry

[vercel]

Someone is attempting to deploy a commit to the shravan20's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The server startup logic in initiateServer was enclosed within a try-catch block to handle initialization errors. If an error occurs during server setup, it is logged and the process exits with a non-zero status. No changes were made to function signatures or exported entities.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/app.js	Wrapped server initialization in try-catch for error handling; logs and exits on error.

Poem

The server now starts with a cautious hop,
Wrapped in a try-catch, it’s ready to stop
If trouble should nibble at startup’s green field,
A log and an exit—no secrets concealed!
With error-handling whiskers, we bravely proceed,
The safest of bunnies, in every deed. 🐇

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1ba495 and ebe144d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/app.js (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (2)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: marceloams
PR: shravan20/github-readme-quotes#324
File: src/api/controllers/authorsController.js:32-38
Timestamp: 2024-10-13T22:00:28.355Z
Learning: In the `github-readme-quotes` project, the error handling in `src/api/controllers/authorsController.js` intentionally mirrors that in `src/api/controllers/quotesController.js`, and this consistent approach is preferred.

Learnt from: Satorino01
PR: shravan20/github-readme-quotes#336
File: src/api/services/quotesService.js:72-87
Timestamp: 2025-02-16T20:29:22.436Z
Learning: In the github-readme-quotes project, HTTP errors like rate limiting (429) are handled at the fetchApi.js level, so individual service methods don't need to implement specific status code handling.

Learnt from: marceloams
PR: shravan20/github-readme-quotes#324
File: src/api/services/quotesService.js:81-114
Timestamp: 2024-10-13T22:12:42.078Z
Learning: In this codebase, try-catch blocks that rethrow the original error are used in functions like `getQuote` and `getAuthors` for consistency.

src/app.js (2)

Learnt from: marceloams
PR: shravan20/github-readme-quotes#324
File: src/api/services/quotesService.js:81-114
Timestamp: 2024-10-13T22:12:42.078Z
Learning: In this codebase, try-catch blocks that rethrow the original error are used in functions like `getQuote` and `getAuthors` for consistency.

Learnt from: marceloams
PR: shravan20/github-readme-quotes#324
File: src/api/controllers/authorsController.js:32-38
Timestamp: 2024-10-13T22:00:28.355Z
Learning: In the `github-readme-quotes` project, the error handling in `src/api/controllers/authorsController.js` intentionally mirrors that in `src/api/controllers/quotesController.js`, and this consistent approach is preferred.

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/app.js (1)

11-33: LGTM! Excellent addition of server startup error handling.

This change adds robust error handling around the server initialization process, which is a best practice for production applications. The try-catch block appropriately captures potential failures during:

• Express app setup and middleware configuration
• Swagger documentation initialization (which involves async operations)
• Server binding to the specified port

The error logging and process.exit(1) approach is appropriate for startup failures, ensuring the application fails fast if it cannot initialize properly.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[raunzw]

Hi! 👋

This PR includes a minor documentation update and an improvement to error handling in app.js. However, my commits aren't signed because I haven't set up GPG yet.

Since the changes are helpful and don't involve any sensitive logic, would you be open to bypassing the signed commit requirement just for this PR?

Thanks so much for your time and for maintaining this project! 🚀