-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
[fp024f] Rear Fender Study
Yosuke Yamamoto edited this page May 9, 2021
·
60 revisions
Since there was room to raise the rear fender deck by 50 mm, I simulated some rear fender models of 50mm higher deck with some aerodynamic devices.
- Overall Length : 3980 [mm]
- Overall Width : 1800 [mm]
- Wheel Base : 2650 [mm]
- Road Legal Design
- GitHub: https://github.com/y-yosuke/formula-ppoino
- Control ( Recalculated: fp024c - Side Mirror C & Fr Fender Louver C3 )
- 50mm Higher Deck
- 50mm Higher Deck + Fairing Fin
- 50mm Higher Deck + Fairing Box
- 50mm Higher Deck + Fairing Fin + Upper Fence
- Control + Radiator Outlet Louvre
- 50mm Higher Deck + Radiator Outlet Louvre
SimScale Project URL: https://www.simscale.com/workbench/?pid=6664511854195853653&mi=spec%3A9f1f9ba5-3e8f-4cc6-bf71-eb8d96356531%2Cservice%3ASIMULATION%2Cstrategy%3A11943
- Freestream Velocity Magnitude Value : 30 [m/s]
- Ride Height : Front / Rear = 110 [mm] / 110 [mm]
- NOTE
- RF: Radiator Flow
Coef. | Whole Car | Body | Fr Wheel | Rr Wheel |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cm | 0.0263 | 0.0013 | 0.0211 | 0.0039 |
Cd | 0.5688 | 0.4574 | 0.0491 | 0.0623 |
Cl | -0.1923 | -0.2300 | 0.0304 | 0.0073 |
Clf | -0.0698 | -0.1137 | 0.0363 | 0.0076 |
Clr | -0.1225 | -0.1163 | -0.0059 | -0.0003 |
CoP | 0.6369 | 0.5056 | -0.1936 | -0.0379 |
L/D | -0.3380 | -0.5029 | 0.6187 | 0.1179 |
RF | 0.1628 | m3/s |
Coef. | Whole Car | Body | Fr Wheel | Rr Wheel |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cm | 0.0258 | 0.0007 | 0.0212 | 0.0039 |
Cd | 0.5684 | 0.4556 | 0.0492 | 0.0636 |
Cl | -0.1941 | -0.2326 | 0.0306 | 0.0078 |
Clf | -0.0713 | -0.1155 | 0.0365 | 0.0078 |
Clr | -0.1229 | -0.1170 | -0.0059 | 0.0000 |
CoP | 0.6328 | 0.5031 | -0.1925 | 0.0044 |
L/D | -0.3416 | -0.5105 | 0.6224 | 0.1227 |
RF | 0.1620 | m3/s |
Coef. | Whole Car | Body | Fr Wheel | Rr Wheel |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cm | 0.0258 | 0.0005 | 0.0212 | 0.0041 |
Cd | 0.5681 | 0.4569 | 0.0492 | 0.0620 |
Cl | -0.1980 | -0.2355 | 0.0306 | 0.0069 |
Clf | -0.0732 | -0.1173 | 0.0365 | 0.0076 |
Clr | -0.1248 | -0.1183 | -0.0059 | -0.0006 |
CoP | 0.6303 | 0.5022 | -0.1930 | -0.0916 |
L/D | -0.3486 | -0.5156 | 0.6207 | 0.1120 |
RF | 0.1620 | m3/s |
Coef. | Whole Car | Body | Fr Wheel | Rr Wheel |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cm | 0.0264 | 0.0038 | 0.0212 | 0.0014 |
Cd | 0.5671 | 0.4594 | 0.0493 | 0.0584 |
Cl | -0.1949 | -0.2372 | 0.0307 | 0.0117 |
Clf | -0.0710 | -0.1148 | 0.0366 | 0.0072 |
Clr | -0.1239 | -0.1225 | -0.0059 | 0.0045 |
CoP | 0.6356 | 0.5162 | -0.1925 | 0.3842 |
L/D | -0.3437 | -0.5163 | 0.6225 | 0.1999 |
RF | 0.1626 | m3/s |
Coef. | Whole Car | Body | Fr Wheel | Rr Wheel |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cm | 0.0248 | -0.0005 | 0.0215 | 0.0039 |
Cd | 0.5691 | 0.4582 | 0.0497 | 0.0613 |
Cl | -0.1958 | -0.2342 | 0.0311 | 0.0073 |
Clf | -0.0730 | -0.1176 | 0.0371 | 0.0075 |
Clr | -0.1227 | -0.1165 | -0.0059 | -0.0002 |
CoP | 0.6269 | 0.4977 | -0.1911 | -0.0315 |
L/D | -0.3440 | -0.5111 | 0.6265 | 0.1186 |
RF | 0.1913 | m3/s |
Coef. | Whole Car | Body | Fr Wheel | Rr Wheel |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cm | 0.0278 | 0.0032 | 0.0210 | 0.0036 |
Cd | 0.5662 | 0.4565 | 0.0492 | 0.0605 |
Cl | -0.1839 | -0.2219 | 0.0303 | 0.0077 |
Clf | -0.0641 | -0.1077 | 0.0362 | 0.0074 |
Clr | -0.1197 | -0.1141 | -0.0059 | 0.0003 |
CoP | 0.6512 | 0.5144 | -0.1945 | 0.0388 |
L/D | -0.3247 | -0.4861 | 0.6159 | 0.1276 |
RF | 0.2447 | m3/s |
Coef. | Whole Car | Body | Fr Wheel | Rr Wheel |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cm | 0.0263 | 0.0018 | 0.0212 | 0.0033 |
Cd | 0.5674 | 0.4562 | 0.0492 | 0.0620 |
Cl | -0.1890 | -0.2281 | 0.0306 | 0.0086 |
Clf | -0.0682 | -0.1123 | 0.0364 | 0.0076 |
Clr | -0.1208 | -0.1159 | -0.0059 | 0.0010 |
CoP | 0.6391 | 0.5079 | -0.1931 | 0.1129 |
L/D | -0.3331 | -0.5000 | 0.6205 | 0.1380 |
RF | 0.2358 | m3/s |
Comparison of the Whole Body Coefficients
Coef. | Control | 50mm H-D Std |
50mm H-D Fin |
50mm H-D Box |
50mm H-D Fin+UprFence |
Control + Rad. Louver |
50mm H-D Std + Rad. Louver |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cd | 0.5688 | 0.5684 | 0.5681 | 0.5671 | 0.5691 | 0.5662 | 0.5674 |
Cl | -0.1923 | -0.1941 | -0.1980 | -0.1949 | -0.1958 | -0.1839 | -0.1890 |
Clf | -0.0698 | -0.0713 | -0.0732 | -0.0710 | -0.0730 | -0.0641 | -0.0682 |
Clr | -0.1225 | -0.1229 | -0.1248 | -0.1239 | -0.1227 | -0.1197 | -0.1208 |
CoP | 0.6369 | 0.6328 | 0.6303 | 0.6356 | 0.6269 | 0.6512 | 0.6391 |
L/D | -0.3380 | -0.3416 | -0.3486 | -0.3437 | -0.3440 | -0.3247 | -0.3331 |
RF m3/s | 0.1628 | 0.1620 | 0.1620 | 0.1626 | 0.1913 | 0.2447 | 0.2358 |
Differences from "Original Rear Fender (Control)" - Coefficients
Coef. | Control | 50mm H-D Std |
50mm H-D Fin |
50mm H-D Box |
50mm H-D Fin+UprFence |
Control + Rad. Louver |
50mm H-D Std + Rad. Louver |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
∆Cd | 0.0000 | -0.0004 | -0.0007 | -0.0017 | 0.0003 | -0.0026 | -0.0014 |
∆Cl | 0.0000 | -0.0019 | -0.0058 | -0.0026 | -0.0035 | 0.0084 | 0.0033 |
∆Clf | 0.0000 | -0.0015 | -0.0034 | -0.0012 | -0.0032 | 0.0057 | 0.0016 |
∆Clr | 0.0000 | -0.0004 | -0.0024 | -0.0014 | -0.0003 | 0.0027 | 0.0017 |
∆CoP | 0.0000 | -0.0040 | -0.0066 | -0.0013 | -0.0100 | 0.0143 | 0.0022 |
∆L/D | 0.0000 | -0.0035 | -0.0106 | -0.0056 | -0.0060 | 0.0133 | 0.0049 |
∆RF m3/s | 0.0000 | -0.0008 | -0.0008 | -0.0002 | 0.0285 | 0.0819 | 0.0730 |
- "Rr Fender 50mm Higher Deck + Fin" increases front and rear downforces best.
- Front and rear downforce increasements of "Rr Fender 50mm Higher Deck + Box" are around half compared to the "Fin" type.
- "Rr Fender 50mm Higher Deck + Box" has slight adavntage with drag decreasement compared to the "Fin" type
- It may be possible to reduce drag by developing "Box" shape.
- "Rr Fender 50mm Higher Deck + Fin + Upper Fence" spoils the rear downforce improved by "Fin" shape, but it has the effect of increasing the radiator flow which will be described later.
- Radiator outlet louvres reduce downforce, but "Rr Fender 50mm Higher Deck + Radiator Louvre" reduces the reduction.
- 4 cases: "Control", "Rr Fender 50mm Higher Deck", "Rr Fender 50mm Higher Deck + Fin" and "Rr Fender 50mm Higher Deck + Box" are almost the same.
- "Rr Fender 50mm Higher Deck + Fin + Upper Fence" has the highest radiator flow rate among the models without louvers, which is about 18% higher.
- "Rr Fender-50mm Higher Deck + Radiator Louvre" has about 3.6% less radiator flow rate than "Control + Radiator Louvre".
- But as mentioned above, it has less adverse effect on downforce.
- The radiator outlet louvres seem to reduce downforce by reducing the low pressure on the underside of the floor.
- Comparing the 2 models with radiator louvers, "50mm Higher Deck" seems to have a slightly stronger low pressure on the underside of the floor.
- The "50mm Higher Deck" models generally tend to have better aerodynamic performance than the "Control" model.
- The "50mm Higher Deck" model reduces the drop in aerodynamic performance when a radiator outlet louver is installed.
- Among the "50mm Higher Deck" models,
- "Fin" type increases downforce both front and rear best,
- "Box" type has a potential for low drag shapes,
- "Upper Fence" spoils the increase in "Fin" type rear downforce, but increases the radiator flow.