feat(settings): Refactor settings form into sections (resolves #215). #242
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@junhaoliao has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 28 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
WalkthroughThis pull request rearchitects the settings panel by introducing new modular React components for managing configuration form fields. The update adds three primary components—SettingsFormField, SettingsFormFieldSectionsGroup, and SettingsFormFieldsSection—which leverage Material UI Joy components for layout and styling. A new CSS file supporting flex layouts and spacing for the sections is also introduced, while outdated CSS and inline rendering logic in the main settings file have been removed. The overall changes aim to encapsulate the configuration input functionality within reusable components. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant ST as SettingsTabPanel
participant SFG as SettingsFormFieldSectionsGroup
participant SFS as SettingsFormFieldsSection
participant SF as SettingsFormField
U->>ST: Open settings panel
ST->>SFG: Render settings sections group
SFG->>SFG: Generate configuration sections (getConfigFormFieldSections)
SFG->>SFS: Render each section
SFS->>SF: Render individual form field based on props
SF-->>SFS: Return rendered field
SFS-->>SFG: Complete section rendering
SFG-->>ST: Return complete form layout
ST-->>U: Display settings form
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormField.tsx (1)
30-49: Consider adding an onChange handler.The component correctly renders the form field with the provided props, but lacks an onChange handler which would make it more reusable for dynamic form interactions.
interface SettingsFormFieldProps { configKey: string; helperText: string | React.ReactNode; initialValue: string | number; label: string; type: string; + onChange?: (event: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => void; } const SettingsFormField = ({ configKey, helperText, initialValue, label, type, + onChange, }: SettingsFormFieldProps) => ( <FormControl> <FormLabel> {label} </FormLabel> <Input defaultValue={initialValue} name={configKey} type={type} + onChange={onChange}/> <FormHelperText> {helperText} </FormHelperText> </FormControl> );src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldSectionsGroup.tsx (2)
35-40: Consider error handling for config retrieval.The code retrieves configuration values without handling potential errors if the configuration keys don't exist.
{ configKey: LOCAL_STORAGE_KEY.PAGE_SIZE, helperText: "Number of log messages to display per page.", - initialValue: getConfig(CONFIG_KEY.PAGE_SIZE), + initialValue: (() => { + try { + return getConfig(CONFIG_KEY.PAGE_SIZE); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to get page size config:", error); + return 100; // Default value + } + })(), label: "View: Page size", type: "number", },
64-64: Consider error handling for nested config retrieval.The code retrieves nested configuration values without handling potential errors if the configuration keys don't exist.
-initialValue: getConfig(CONFIG_KEY.DECODER_OPTIONS).formatString, +initialValue: (() => { + try { + const decoderOptions = getConfig(CONFIG_KEY.DECODER_OPTIONS); + return decoderOptions?.formatString || ""; + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to get decoder options format string:", error); + return ""; + } +})(),src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/index.tsx (1)
72-72: Use Yoda conditions for boolean checks.Consider using Yoda conditions (
false === expressioninstead ofexpression === false) to prevent accidental assignments.- if (null !== error) { + if (false === (null === error)) {Alternatively:
- if (null !== error) { + if (null !== error) {Either approach is acceptable according to your coding guidelines, but the first option is preferred based on your guidelines.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormField.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldSectionsGroup.css(1 hunks)src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldSectionsGroup.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldsSection.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/index.css(0 hunks)src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/index.tsx(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/index.css
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.{cpp,hpp,java,js,jsx,tpp,ts,tsx}`: - Prefer `false == ` rather than `!`.
**/*.{cpp,hpp,java,js,jsx,tpp,ts,tsx}: - Preferfalse == <expression>rather than!<expression>.
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormField.tsxsrc/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldSectionsGroup.tsxsrc/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldsSection.tsxsrc/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/index.tsx
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldSectionsGroup.tsx (3)
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormField.tsx (1)
SettingsFormFieldProps(52-52)src/typings/config.ts (2)
LOCAL_STORAGE_KEY(45-45)CONFIG_KEY(44-44)src/utils/config.ts (1)
getConfig(182-182)
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldsSection.tsx (1)
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormField.tsx (1)
SettingsFormFieldProps(52-52)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldSectionsGroup.css (2)
1-7: The container styling looks good.The flexbox layout with vertical overflow provides an appropriate structure for the settings form sections group container.
9-11: Good spacing for the sections group.The gap property provides consistent spacing between child elements in the sections group.
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormField.tsx (1)
11-17: Interface looks good.The props interface clearly defines the expected properties for the settings form field component.
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldsSection.tsx (1)
13-16: Interface is well-defined.The props interface correctly defines the section name and allows for a flexible array of fields.
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldSectionsGroup.tsx (1)
26-29: Well-typed return value.The return type accurately describes the structure of the form field sections.
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/index.tsx (3)
25-25: Import optimization reflects component changes.The removal of
getConfigfrom the imports aligns with the architectural changes where configuration handling is now delegated to child components, resulting in cleaner responsibilities for this parent component.
27-27: Modular approach with new component import.The introduction of
SettingsFormFieldSectionsGroupsupports the refactoring of settings into foldable sections, aligning with the PR objectives to improve organization and usability.
98-98: Implementation of sectioned settings layout.The replacement of the previous form fields rendering with the
SettingsFormFieldSectionsGroupcomponent successfully implements the PR objective of organizing settings into foldable sections. The code is now more maintainable and modular, with clear separation of concerns.
| {fields.map( | ||
| (f, index) => ( | ||
| React.isValidElement(f) ? | ||
| f : | ||
| <SettingsFormField | ||
| key={index} | ||
| {...(f as SettingsFormFieldProps)}/> | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid using array index as key.
Using the array index as a key can lead to performance issues and unexpected behavior when items are added, removed, or reordered. Consider using a more stable identifier.
{fields.map(
(f, index) => (
React.isValidElement(f) ?
f :
<SettingsFormField
- key={index}
+ key={`field-${(f as SettingsFormFieldProps).configKey}`}
{...(f as SettingsFormFieldProps)}/>
)
)}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {fields.map( | |
| (f, index) => ( | |
| React.isValidElement(f) ? | |
| f : | |
| <SettingsFormField | |
| key={index} | |
| {...(f as SettingsFormFieldProps)}/> | |
| ) | |
| {fields.map( | |
| (f, index) => ( | |
| React.isValidElement(f) ? | |
| f : | |
| <SettingsFormField | |
| key={`field-${(f as SettingsFormFieldProps).configKey}`} | |
| {...(f as SettingsFormFieldProps)}/> | |
| ) | |
| } |
...nts/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldSectionsGroup.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...nts/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldSectionsGroup.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
junhaoliao
changed the title
# Conflicts: # src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/index.tsx
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldsSection.tsx (1)
34-41: Avoid using array index as key.Using the array index as a key can lead to performance issues and unexpected behavior when items are added, removed, or reordered. Consider using a more stable identifier.
{fields.map( (f, index) => ( React.isValidElement(f) ? f : <SettingsFormField - key={index} + key={`field-${(f as SettingsFormFieldProps).configKey}`} {...(f as SettingsFormFieldProps)}/> ) )}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormField.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldsSection.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/index.tsx(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.{cpp,hpp,java,js,jsx,tpp,ts,tsx}`: - Prefer `false == ` rather than `!`.
**/*.{cpp,hpp,java,js,jsx,tpp,ts,tsx}: - Preferfalse == <expression>rather than!<expression>.
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormField.tsxsrc/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldsSection.tsxsrc/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/index.tsx
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormFieldsSection.tsx (1)
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormField.tsx (1)
SettingsFormFieldProps(57-57)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/index.tsx (1)
98-98: Great refactoring of the settings form!Replacing the manually defined form fields with a dedicated component improves modularity and makes the code more maintainable. The
SettingsFormFieldSectionsGroupencapsulates the form field rendering logic, allowing this file to focus on form submission and reset handling.src/components/CentralContainer/Sidebar/SidebarTabs/SettingsTabPanel/SettingsFormField.tsx (1)
42-42: Excellent use of yoda condition.Your conditional check with
"number" === typefollows the project's coding guidelines of putting constants on the left side of comparisons. This helps prevent accidental assignments and is the preferred style in this codebase.
| {"number" === type ? | ||
| <Input | ||
| defaultValue={initialValue} | ||
| name={configKey} | ||
| type={"number"}/> : | ||
| <Textarea | ||
| defaultValue={initialValue} | ||
| name={configKey}/>} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider supporting more input types.
Currently, the component only handles "number" type specifically and defaults to a textarea for all other types. In the future, you might want to support more HTML input types (text, email, password, etc.) for better form control and validation.
- {"number" === type ?
- <Input
- defaultValue={initialValue}
- name={configKey}
- type={"number"}/> :
- <Textarea
- defaultValue={initialValue}
- name={configKey}/>}
+ {(() => {
+ switch(type) {
+ case "number":
+ return (
+ <Input
+ defaultValue={initialValue}
+ name={configKey}
+ type={"number"}/>
+ );
+ case "textarea":
+ return (
+ <Textarea
+ defaultValue={initialValue}
+ name={configKey}/>
+ );
+ default:
+ return (
+ <Input
+ defaultValue={initialValue}
+ name={configKey}
+ type={type}/>
+ );
+ }
+ })()}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {"number" === type ? | |
| <Input | |
| defaultValue={initialValue} | |
| name={configKey} | |
| type={"number"}/> : | |
| <Textarea | |
| defaultValue={initialValue} | |
| name={configKey}/>} | |
| {(() => { | |
| switch (type) { | |
| case "number": | |
| return ( | |
| <Input | |
| defaultValue={initialValue} | |
| name={configKey} | |
| type={"number"} | |
| /> | |
| ); | |
| case "textarea": | |
| return ( | |
| <Textarea | |
| defaultValue={initialValue} | |
| name={configKey} | |
| /> | |
| ); | |
| default: | |
| return ( | |
| <Input | |
| defaultValue={initialValue} | |
| name={configKey} | |
| type={type} | |
| /> | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| })()} |
…que identification
…nique name identifier
Description
See:
Checklist
breaking change.
Validation performed
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Style
Refactor