Skip to content

Conversation

kirkrodrigues
Copy link
Member

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues commented Apr 17, 2025

Description

As @junhaoliao reported offline, the ClpKeyValuePairStreamHandler is incompatible with other handlers since it requires the msg argument passed to the logging methods to be a dictionary whereas other handlers require that it's a format string. After discussing it offline with @LinZhihao-723, we decided to warn users for now and eventually develop a better solution that doesn't violate Python's logging handler conventions.

Checklist

  • The PR satisfies the contribution guidelines.
  • This is a breaking change and that has been indicated in the PR title, OR this isn't a
    breaking change.
  • Necessary docs have been updated, OR no docs need to be updated.

Validation performed

Validated the addition to the README looks correct on GitHub.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a warning to the documentation for the ClpKeyValuePairStreamHandler logging handler about incompatibility with other logging handlers and potential future changes.

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues requested a review from a team as a code owner April 17, 2025 01:49
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 17, 2025

Walkthrough

A warning was added to the documentation for the ClpKeyValuePairStreamHandler logging handler in the README.md file. The warning clarifies that this handler cannot be used alongside other logging handlers due to its requirement that the msg argument be a dictionary, which differs from the expectations of standard handlers. The note also indicates a possible future change to the handler's implementation or location.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added a warning note to the documentation for ClpKeyValuePairStreamHandler, explaining incompatibility with other logging handlers and possible future changes.

Possibly related PRs

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

50-50: Remove blank line inside blockquote

markdownlint reports MD028 (“no blank lines inside blockquote”) here. Please remove the empty blockquote line or add a > if a deliberate break is needed.

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

50-50: Blank line inside blockquote
null

(MD028, no-blanks-blockquote)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8eab490 and d30dc68.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md

50-50: Blank line inside blockquote
null

(MD028, no-blanks-blockquote)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: test-python37 (ubuntu-22.04, 3.7)
  • GitHub Check: test-python37 (macos-13, 3.7)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest, 3.8)
  • GitHub Check: test (macos-latest, 3.8)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

46-49: Approve the warning addition

The newly added warning clearly informs users of the limitation: ClpKeyValuePairStreamHandler must receive a dictionary in the msg argument and therefore can’t be used concurrently with other handlers that expect a format string. This documentation update addresses the reported confusion well.

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues requested a review from Copilot April 17, 2025 01:53
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Co-authored-by: Lin Zhihao <[email protected]>
LinZhihao-723
LinZhihao-723 previously approved these changes Apr 17, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

46-50: Refine warning phrasing and remove blank line
The new warning is helpful, but you can improve readability by splitting it into shorter sentences. Also, markdownlint flags a blank line inside the blockquote at line 51 (MD028). Removing that blank line will resolve the lint error. For example:

@@ lines 46-50
- > [!WARNING]
- > This handler cannot be used with other logging handlers since it requires `msg` (the first
- > argument passed to the logging method) to be a dictionary. In contrast, standard handlers
- > typically treat `msg` as a format string. In the future, this handler may be moved or reworked to
- > avoid confusion.
+ > [!WARNING]
+ > This handler cannot be used alongside other Python logging handlers because it requires the
+ > `msg` argument to be a dictionary instead of a format string.
+ > We plan to revisit or relocate this handler in a future release to better align with standard
+ > logging conventions.
@@ line 51
+ (remove this blank line)

Also applies to: 51-51

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a3caef4 and 18ad676.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md

51-51: Blank line inside blockquote
null

(MD028, no-blanks-blockquote)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest, 3.8)
  • GitHub Check: test (macos-latest, 3.8)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: test-python37 (ubuntu-22.04, 3.7)
  • GitHub Check: test-python37 (macos-13, 3.7)

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues merged commit 4c1406d into y-scope:main Apr 17, 2025
9 checks passed
@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues deleted the incompatibility-warning branch April 17, 2025 19:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants