Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make indexer handle null block hashes #473

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2025
Merged

Conversation

fbac
Copy link
Collaborator

@fbac fbac commented Feb 10, 2025

Before the future release 0.2.0 the block_hash is not stored in database. In future releases we're using the block_hash to check for reorgs.

There's a rare corner case where the indexer tries to retrieve a block hash that happens to be null, in that case we should skip it and check for reorgs later in the chain.

In the case when a reorg happens later in the chain, and the reorg handler algorithm determines the reorg happened in a range we don't have any data about, then the indexer should simply start indexing from 0, as it's the safest option.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced reorganization detection by adding safeguards to handle scenarios with missing block data.
    • Improved error handling to prevent issues during blockchain updates.

@fbac fbac added the indexer Blockchain indexing label Feb 10, 2025
@fbac fbac requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2025 18:54
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces two modifications focused on enhancing error handling related to blockchain reorganization detection. In the pkg/indexer/indexer.go file, the indexLogs function now checks that storedBlockHash is not nil before comparing it with the on-chain block’s hash. In the pkg/indexer/reorgHandler.go file, the FindReorgPoint method gains a new conditional branch that handles cases where the oldest block’s hash is nil by retrieving block number zero and updating canonicality within a specific range. No changes have been made to exported or public entities.

Changes

File Summary
pkg/indexer/indexer.go Added a check in indexLogs to ensure storedBlockHash is not nil before comparing with the on-chain block hash to prevent nil dereference errors.
pkg/indexer/reorgHandler.go Introduced a new conditional in FindReorgPoint to handle a nil BlockHash for oldestBlock by retrieving block zero via client.BlockByNumber and updating canonicality.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant ReorgHandler
    participant Client
    participant QueryUpdater

    Caller->>ReorgHandler: Invoke FindReorgPoint(oldestBlock)
    alt oldestBlock.BlockHash is nil
        ReorgHandler->>Client: BlockByNumber(0)
        Client-->>ReorgHandler: block0
        ReorgHandler->>QueryUpdater: UpdateBlocksCanonicalityInRange(0, detectedAt)
        QueryUpdater-->>ReorgHandler: Confirmation
        ReorgHandler-->>Caller: Return block0.Hash
    else BlockHash is present
        ReorgHandler-->>Caller: Proceed with existing logic
    end
Loading

Suggested reviewers

  • mkysel

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8e4dada and 2014b6c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pkg/indexer/indexer.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/indexer/reorgHandler.go (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test (Node)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pkg/indexer/reorgHandler.go (1)

72-89: LGTM! The null block hash handling looks good.

The implementation correctly handles the case where the oldest block's hash is null by:

  1. Retrieving block 0 from the chain
  2. Updating canonicality for the affected range
  3. Returning block 0's hash as the reorg point

This aligns with the PR objective of deferring reorg checks when encountering null block hashes.

pkg/indexer/indexer.go (1)

303-304: LGTM! The null check is a necessary safeguard.

The addition of the null check for storedBlockHash prevents potential nil pointer dereferences during block hash comparison and aligns with the changes in reorgHandler.go.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mkysel
Copy link
Collaborator

mkysel commented Feb 10, 2025

LGTM. Do you wanna absorb #471 into this and merge both together?

@fbac fbac merged commit b789de6 into main Feb 12, 2025
7 checks passed
@fbac fbac deleted the indexer-handle-null-hashes branch February 12, 2025 09:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
indexer Blockchain indexing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants