-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make indexer handle null block hashes #473
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces two modifications focused on enhancing error handling related to blockchain reorganization detection. In the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant ReorgHandler
participant Client
participant QueryUpdater
Caller->>ReorgHandler: Invoke FindReorgPoint(oldestBlock)
alt oldestBlock.BlockHash is nil
ReorgHandler->>Client: BlockByNumber(0)
Client-->>ReorgHandler: block0
ReorgHandler->>QueryUpdater: UpdateBlocksCanonicalityInRange(0, detectedAt)
QueryUpdater-->>ReorgHandler: Confirmation
ReorgHandler-->>Caller: Return block0.Hash
else BlockHash is present
ReorgHandler-->>Caller: Proceed with existing logic
end
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
LGTM. Do you wanna absorb #471 into this and merge both together? |
Before the future release 0.2.0 the block_hash is not stored in database. In future releases we're using the block_hash to check for reorgs.
There's a rare corner case where the indexer tries to retrieve a block hash that happens to be null, in that case we should skip it and check for reorgs later in the chain.
In the case when a reorg happens later in the chain, and the reorg handler algorithm determines the reorg happened in a range we don't have any data about, then the indexer should simply start indexing from 0, as it's the safest option.
Summary by CodeRabbit