Adapt block type tests to work across all WP versions

[schlessera]

Fixes #7

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @schlessera, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the existing block type command tests to enhance their reliability and compatibility across different WordPress versions. The primary change involves switching the specific block types used in test assertions from core/paragraph and core/heading to core/archives and core/categories. This modification addresses potential inconsistencies in block availability or behavior, particularly concerning dynamic block properties, ensuring the tests remain accurate and stable regardless of the WordPress environment.

Highlights

• Test Block Type Update: Replaced core/paragraph with core/archives and core/heading with core/categories in various wp block type command tests to ensure more consistent behavior across WordPress versions.
• Cross-Version Compatibility: The changes aim to make block type tests more robust and compatible across various WordPress versions by utilizing blocks with more stable and predictable properties for testing.
• Dynamic/Static Block Testing Refinement: Adjusted tests to better reflect dynamic vs. static block properties, including adding new checks for the --format=count output and clarifying static block registration behavior in WordPress 5.5 and later.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the block type feature tests to improve their reliability across different WordPress versions. The main change is replacing assertions for the core/paragraph static block with the core/archives dynamic block, which is more consistently registered. The tests have also been refactored to better organize checks for dynamic and static blocks, with tests for static blocks now correctly scoped to WordPress 5.5 and later. I've suggested re-introducing a test to verify is_dynamic:false for a static block within the appropriate scenario to maintain test coverage.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!