feat: add optional 'tag' parameter to message() #179
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi! @patapizza @martinraison @Sharan-Babu Just following up on this PR — it's been 2 weeks. All checks are green and CLA is signed. Let me know if anything else is needed. Thanks! 🙌 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Added an optional
tagparameter to themessage()method to support multiple app versions when making requests to the Wit.ai API.This makes it easier to specify which version (tag) of the app the message should be evaluated against.
Changes
message()inwit.pyto accept atagargument.tagis added to the request params.Use Case
I have multiple versions of my app on Wit.ai, and this change allows me to direct queries to a specific version using the
tagparameter. This helps in testing and deploying versioned NLP models without modifying core logic.Related Issue
Fixes #167
Let me know if anything else needs tweaking!