ci: Archive Kover report for debugging

[vitorhugods]

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

Issues

Our Codecov reports have missing files

Causes

Under investigation

Solutions

Work in Progress:

1. Archive report for debugging
2. Next steps?

---

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

• If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

---

References

1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

[github-actions]

Unit Test Results

120 files   -   14  120 suites   - 14   1m 0s ⏱️ +44s
579 tests +    2  571 ✔️ ±    0  8 💤 +2  0 ❌ ±0 
989 runs  +412  981 ✔️ +410  8 💤 +2  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit d96686f. ± Comparison against base commit 8006187.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #567 (a4b651f) into develop (4e54d8a) will decrease coverage by 8.25%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head a4b651f differs from pull request most recent head 0ac23c3. Consider uploading reports for the commit 0ac23c3 to get more accurate results

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop     #567      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      55.81%   47.56%   -8.26%     
- Complexity         0      635     +635     
=============================================
  Files            339      434      +95     
  Lines           6457    13027    +6570     
  Branches         619      976     +357     
=============================================
+ Hits            3604     6196    +2592     
- Misses          2631     6548    +3917     
- Partials         222      283      +61     

[vitorhugods]

Maybe it's codecov related? As it seems that the Kover report does contain all the files we want.

[yamilmedina]

Maybe it's codecov related? As it seems that the Kover report does contain all the files we want.

Yeah it seems to, I tried changing the engine, but changed a bit only. Also I'm wondering and trying to understand if maybe codecov just omits interfaces 🤔 since those files looks like interfaces, but can't be sure yet.

Also as a ref, Kotlin/kotlinx-kover#117

[yamilmedina]

I'm happy with this so far as an intermedius step, also I agree that further investigation has to be made, all pointing to codecov misinterpreting the coverage file.

[vitorhugods]

I think we're stuck here: https://docs.codecov.com/docs/fixing-paths

I'm trying to run a few reports without Codecov's default path fixing and with/without Jacoco's format to compare the XMLs and see how to make the path's match Git's paths.

[vitorhugods]

I wrote my findings here: Kotlin/kotlinx-kover#189

As you said, @yamilmedina, it's better to leave the way it is for now, so at least we get SOME reporting. But in general it just seems that it's not currently supported by the couple Codecov + Kover.

The percentage is wrong, there are missing files, but it does help to see coverage going up or down to the files that aren't missing.

We just need to keep an eye open.