Suggestions from January review on §2 #196
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@afs' suggestion #6 https://gist.github.com/afs/f71020019fc33b4ded3e105339c6a655 I generally agree with Andy: I think that most *syntaxes* will (eventually) support Full RDF 1.2, but it is specific implementations that may impose restrictions. Conversely, listing those syntaxes under "Full Conformance" may give the wrong impression that *other* syntaxes would be needed by Classic/Basic implementations.
pchampin
added
the
spec:enhancement
gkellogg
reviewed
Apr 24, 2025
hartig
approved these changes
Apr 24, 2025
to restate my comment at the top: I don't believe that the Full/Basic distinction should be thought in terms of formats. All implementations (Full ones and Basic ones) will probably use the same formats (N-Triples, Turtle, JSON-LD...), but Basic implementation will use a subset of these formats (probably hinted with the profile= media-type parameter, by the way). |
TallTed
approved these changes
Apr 24, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@afs' suggestion #6
https://gist.github.com/afs/f71020019fc33b4ded3e105339c6a655
I generally agree with Andy:
I think that most syntaxes will (eventually) support Full RDF 1.2, but it is specific implementations that may impose restrictions.
Conversely, listing those syntaxes under "Full Conformance" may give the wrong impression that other syntaxes would be needed by Classic/Basic implementations.
Preview | Diff