Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.24.1 #272

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 27, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.21.0 -> 8.24.1 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.21.0 -> 8.24.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.24.1

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [class-methods-use-this] check accessor methods with a function initializer (#​10796)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-misused-promises] don't report on static accessor properties (#​10814)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-deprecated] don't report on deprecated accessor property declaration (#​10813)
  • eslint-plugin: [explicit-member-accessibility] check accessor class properties for missing accessibility modifier (#​10805)
  • eslint-plugin: [explicit-module-boundary-types] check accessor class properties with a function initializer (#​10804)
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-return-this-type] check accessor properties with a function initializer (#​10794)
  • eslint-plugin: [consistent-generic-constructors] check accessor class properties (#​10789)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unsafe-assignment] report on an any value assigned as an initializer of an accessor property (#​10785)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-template-expression] ignore enum and enum members (#​10782)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-inferrable-types] handle accessor (#​10780)
❤️ Thank You
  • Ronen Amiel
  • YeonJuan

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.24.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-condition] make allowConstantLoopConditions more granular (#​10639)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-misused-spread] correct and elaborate string spread report message (#​10751)
  • eslint-plugin: [restrict-plus-operands] report adding bigints to strings when allowNumberAndString is false (#​10737)
❤️ Thank You
  • Josh Goldberg ✨
  • noah
  • Ronen Amiel

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.23.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-boolean-literal-compare] enforce strictNullChecks (#​10712)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-shadow] ignore declare variables in definition files shadowing global variables (#​10710)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-restricted-imports] support regex option (#​10699)
  • eslint-plugin: [dot-notation] handle noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature true (#​10644)
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-nullish-coalescing] fix missing return (#​10732)
  • bump ts-api-utils to ^2.0.1 (#​10761)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-template-expression] allow interpolating type parameter in type context (#​10739)
  • eslint-plugin: [switch-exhaustiveness-check] suggest with qualified name (#​10697)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] should report readonly class properties with a literal initializer (#​10618)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.22.0

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-template-expression] handle template literal type (#​10612)
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-readonly] autofixer doesn't add type to property that is mutated in the constructor (#​10552)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-extraneous-class] handle accessor keyword (#​10678)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-shadow] don't report unnecessarily on valid ways of using module augmentation (#​10616)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-duplicate-type-constituents] handle nested types (#​10638)
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-nullish-coalescing] doesn't report on ternary but on equivalent || (#​10517)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.24.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.24.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.23.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.22.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • parser: add standalone isolatedDeclarations option (#​10499)
❤️ Thank You
  • Josh Goldberg ✨

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.36%. Comparing base (9a20911) to head (25b1f12).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #272   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.36%   94.36%           
=======================================
  Files          79       79           
  Lines        2112     2112           
  Branches      249      249           
=======================================
  Hits         1993     1993           
  Misses        114      114           
  Partials        5        5           
Flag Coverage Δ
backend 93.04% <ø> (ø)
frontend-customer 96.51% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.22.0 chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.22.0 Jan 30, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from d5ef3f7 to 91f0495 Compare January 30, 2025 17:04
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.22.0 chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.23.0 Feb 3, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from e28f173 to e7a9c33 Compare February 9, 2025 13:57
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from e7a9c33 to f34f661 Compare February 10, 2025 17:56
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.23.0 chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.24.0 Feb 10, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from f34f661 to 1b797c2 Compare February 16, 2025 00:06
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 1b797c2 to 25b1f12 Compare February 17, 2025 21:42
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.24.0 chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.24.1 Feb 17, 2025
@w3bdesign w3bdesign merged commit 27be799 into main Feb 17, 2025
5 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch February 17, 2025 23:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants