Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to ^8.24.0 #696

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 11, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) ^8.23.0 -> ^8.24.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) ^8.23.0 -> ^8.24.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.24.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-condition] make allowConstantLoopConditions more granular (#​10639)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-misused-spread] correct and elaborate string spread report message (#​10751)
  • eslint-plugin: [restrict-plus-operands] report adding bigints to strings when allowNumberAndString is false (#​10737)
❤️ Thank You
  • Josh Goldberg ✨
  • noah
  • Ronen Amiel

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.24.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 11, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
dfweb-v4 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 11, 2025 10:28pm

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (11f82fa) to head (843aac4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #696   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           35        35           
  Lines          406       406           
  Branches        96       100    +4     
=========================================
  Hits           406       406           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 12, 2025

Deployment failed with the following error:

Resource is limited - try again in 2 hours (more than 100, code: "api-deployments-free-per-day").

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 6d75fb9 to 4e58145 Compare February 12, 2025 04:59
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 12, 2025

Deployment failed with the following error:

Resource is limited - try again in 5 hours (more than 100, code: "api-deployments-free-per-day").

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 4e58145 to 69fd53b Compare February 12, 2025 05:04
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 69fd53b to 843aac4 Compare February 12, 2025 05:09
@w3bdesign w3bdesign merged commit 50a00fe into main Feb 12, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants