scalar_at take execution_ctx #7166

Performance Regression: -16%

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1101 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1522 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	`case_when_all_false[1000]`	129.8 µs	108.7 µs	+19.44%
❌	Simulation	`case_when_fragmented[100]`	149.2 µs	167.6 µs	-10.98%
❌	Simulation	`scalar_at_struct_wide`	2.9 ms	3.4 ms	-16%
❌	Simulation	`scalar_at_struct_simple`	645.7 µs	759.5 µs	-14.98%
⚡	Simulation	`decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.0, 1.0)]`	10 µs	9 µs	+11.9%

_{Comparing aduffy/scalar_at (09ae39e) with develop (7aa556a)²}

1522 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
No successful run was found on develop (8b83d7b) during the generation of this report, so 7aa556a was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩