We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi!
I noticed that mmlu on official report achieves 66.7 higher than whole data sft and selected data sft,how to explain this ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thank you for your question. In their report, they use macro_avg/acc_char as evaluation metric while we use em as metric in our paper.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hi!
I noticed that mmlu on official report achieves 66.7 higher than whole data sft and selected data sft,how to explain this ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: