touch: support timestamps on WASI

[DePasqualeOrg]

This is ready for review.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 5.99%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 345 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 46 skipped benchmarks¹

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	du_max_depth_balanced_tree[(6, 4, 10)]	66.5 ms	62.6 ms	+6.21%
⚡	Simulation	du_summarize_balanced_tree[(5, 4, 10)]	17.1 ms	16.2 ms	+5.77%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing DePasqualeOrg:codex/wasi-touch-timestamps (ffa27b4) with main (f2c5fec)}

Footnotes

1. 46 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/cut/bounded-memory (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/symlink (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Note: The gnu test tests/cp/link-heap is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Note: The gnu test tests/misc/write-errors was skipped on 'main' but is now failing.