Skip to content

set slim state; closes #376 #384

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2025
Merged

Conversation

petrelharp
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure if this is the right name for this functionality? But I think it does what we want, @ShyamieG - might you be able to have a look?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 11, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.86%. Comparing base (e2470ab) to head (e9d7eb3).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #384      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.75%   96.86%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines         771      797      +26     
  Branches      142      148       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits          746      772      +26     
  Misses         15       15              
  Partials       10       10              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@petrelharp
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm going to merge this, but I'm still hoping @ShyamieG or @bhaller could have a critical read of the docs. Feel free to make comments on this PR (but maybe ping me on slack).

@petrelharp petrelharp merged commit af9e0df into tskit-dev:main Aug 11, 2025
10 checks passed
@bhaller
Copy link
Collaborator

bhaller commented Aug 11, 2025

I'm going to merge this, but I'm still hoping @ShyamieG or @bhaller could have a critical read of the docs. Feel free to make comments on this PR (but maybe ping me on slack).

@petrelharp I already replied to you on Slack...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants