Skip to content

Conversation

@narasul
Copy link
Contributor

@narasul narasul commented Feb 4, 2026

Happy path:

❯ jig deploy --image nginx:1.26
Deploying model: rasuls-test
πŸš€ Creating new deployment
βœ“  Applied new deployment configuration
⏳ Deployment in-progress...
πŸ“¦ [8d875d794-2h27h] Preloading volume contents...
βœ“  [8d875d794-2h27h] Successfully preloaded volume contents. Attaching the volume to the container...
βœ“  [8d875d794-2h27h] New container is running and ready...
πŸš€ Deployment successful!
Note: Additional replicas may still be scaling up.

Failed path:

❯ jig deploy --image nginx:1.25
Deploying model: rasuls-test
βœ“  Applied new deployment configuration
⏳ Deployment in-progress...
πŸ“¦ [7485cddb9f-kvxvl] Preloading volume contents...
βœ“  [7485cddb9f-kvxvl] Successfully preloaded volume contents. Attaching the volume to the container...
⏳ [7485cddb9f-kvxvl] Waiting: RunContainerError
  failed to create containerd task: failed to create shim task: OCI runtime create failed: runc create failed: unable to start container process: exec: "exit": executable file not found in $PATH: unknown
❌ [7485cddb9f-kvxvl] Container is crash looping
  Reason: CrashLoopBackOff
  Message: failed to create containerd task: failed to create shim task: OCI runtime create failed: runc create failed: unable to start container process: exec: "exit": executable file not found in $PATH: unknown

--- Logs for 7485cddb9f-kvxvl ---
[deploy-e6d5c6f0-b903-4d91-94e9-d70b8758933a-7485cddb9f-kvxvl] {"level":"info","ts":1770232034.1522465,"caller":"pythonlauncher/launcher.go:11","msg":"Initializing Python server on port 8000"}

Detach option:

❯ jig deploy --image nginx:1.25 --detach
Deploying model: rasuls-test
βœ“  Applied new deployment configuration

@narasul narasul force-pushed the better-deployment-progress branch 2 times, most recently from 9a4c503 to 50a9a64 Compare February 5, 2026 15:17
@narasul
Copy link
Contributor Author

narasul commented Feb 5, 2026

FAILED tests/integration/resources/test_completion.py::TestTogetherCompletion::test_presence_penalty[meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-Turbo-hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,hi,] - together.APITimeoutError: Request timed out.

I think something is wrong with the models tested in the integ tests, not related this change

@stainless-app stainless-app bot force-pushed the next branch 3 times, most recently from bf5b62f to f270535 Compare February 10, 2026 19:02
@narasul narasul force-pushed the better-deployment-progress branch from 2c423ef to 6960b98 Compare February 12, 2026 19:13
@technillogue technillogue changed the base branch from next to main February 12, 2026 19:32
@technillogue technillogue changed the base branch from main to next February 12, 2026 19:33
@blainekasten blainekasten merged commit 2403a5e into next Feb 12, 2026
9 checks passed
@stainless-app stainless-app bot mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants