Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed tab-index from non-target Gap Fill texts #805

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JdenHartog
Copy link
Contributor

One could argue that also the non-target texts should have a tab-index, but I think its better to go from one answer target straight to the next answer target or the next button. In other words; I don't see why Introtext, Text surrounding targets and Feedback should have a tab-index. This changes:

  • Defines tabIndex = 0 instead of tabIndex = 1 because I remove the Introductory Text tab-index.
  • Removes the tab-indexes from the text surrounding the target.
  • Removes all FeedbackTxt tab-indexes.
  • Removes the tabindex="1" from mainText to remove the Introductory Text tab-index.

One could argue that also the *non-target texts* should have a tab-index, but I think its better to go from the *answer target* straight to the next *answer target* or the *next button*. In other words; I don't see why Introtext, Text surrounding targets and Feedback should have a tab-index. This changes:

- Defines `tabIndex = 0` instead of `tabIndex = 1` because I remove the  *Introductory Text* tab-index.
- Removes the tab-indexes from the *text* surrounding the *target*.
- Removes all *FeedbackTxt* tab-indexes.
- Removes the `tabindex="1"` from `mainText` to remove the  *Introductory Text* tab-index.
@torinfo
Copy link
Collaborator

torinfo commented Oct 29, 2018

@JdenHartog THis one needs some checking with someone who has access to a person using a screenreader. Ill ask Alistair for some guidance on this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants