Skip to content

Add -scanner-prefix-map-paths option and fix multiArg option parsing #1949

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sina-mahdavi
Copy link

The current command-line option for specifying prefix mappings for the dependency scanner does not handle paths containing equal signs. This PR adds a new option -scanner-prefix-map-paths that has a multiArg format instead of being =-separated and fixes this issue. The old -scanner-prefix-map option is still preserved, but is made driver-only and gets translated to the new option format by the driver.
This also fixes the parsing of .multiArg options in OptionParsing.swift so that their corresponding arguments are not added to the general inputs list and are attached to their option correctly.

Corresponding PR on Swift: swiftlang/swift#82745

Copy link
Contributor

@cachemeifyoucan cachemeifyoucan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for handling this.

@@ -216,7 +216,8 @@ public typealias ExternalTargetModuleDetailsMap = [ModuleDependencyId: ExternalT
// Add prefix mapping. The option is cache invariant so it can be added without affecting cache key.
for (key, value) in prefixMap {
commandLine.appendFlag("-cache-replay-prefix-map")
commandLine.appendFlag(value.pathString + "=" + key.pathString)
commandLine.appendFlag(value.pathString)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

swift-driver needs to be compatible with a range of swift compiler. I suggest

isFrontendArgSupported(.scannerPrefixMapPaths)

then do the new option, otherwise, join them with =

@@ -182,10 +182,8 @@ extension OptionTable {
throw OptionParseError.missingArgument(
index: index - 1, argument: argument)
}
parsedOptions.addOption(option, argument: .multiple(Array()))
arguments[index..<endIdx].map { String($0) }.forEach { parsedOptions.addInput($0) }
parsedOptions.addOption(option, argument: .multiple(arguments[index..<endIdx].map { String($0) }))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add a test for this fix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants