Skip to content

Conversation

@PrasiddhShah
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

The student has submitted solutions for three different exercises related to stack and linked list implementations. Here's a detailed evaluation:

  1. Correctness:

    • Exercise_1 (Array-based Stack): The implementation appears correct with proper handling of stack overflow/underflow conditions. The isEmpty() method could be simplified to just check if top == -1.
    • Exercise_2 (Linked List-based Stack): The implementation is correct with proper push/pop operations. The isEmpty() check is correctly implemented.
    • Exercise_3 (Linked List): The implementation is mostly correct but has a bug in printList() where it doesn't print the last node's data.
  2. Time Complexity:

    • All operations (push, pop, peek, isEmpty) are correctly identified as O(1) for both stack implementations.
    • The linked list insert operation is O(n) which is correctly identified.
  3. Space Complexity:

    • Correctly identified as O(n) for all implementations.
  4. Code Quality:

    • Good use of comments explaining time/space complexity.
    • Some methods could be more concise (e.g., isEmpty() in Exercise_1).
    • The printList() method in Exercise_3 needs to be fixed to print all nodes.
    • Consistent indentation and formatting throughout.
  5. Efficiency:

    • The array-based stack could be made more memory efficient by shrinking the array when it becomes significantly empty.
    • The linked list print method should be optimized to print all nodes.

Areas for Improvement:

  • Fix the printList() method in Exercise_3 to print all nodes.
  • Simplify isEmpty() method in Exercise_1.
  • Consider adding more edge case testing (e.g., empty stack operations).
  • Add null checks where appropriate in linked list operations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants