Skip to content

Conversation

mj-ameer
Copy link

No description provided.

Mohaideen Ameer and others added 2 commits August 18, 2025 19:11
@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

The student's solution demonstrates a good understanding of basic data structures (stack and linked list) and their implementations. Here's a detailed evaluation:

Strengths:

  1. Correctness:
    • The stack implementations (both array-based and linked list-based) correctly handle push, pop, and peek operations with proper edge case checks.
    • The linked list implementation correctly handles insertion at the end and traversal.
  2. Time Complexity:
    • The student has correctly identified and documented the time complexities for all operations.
  3. Space Complexity:
    • The space complexity analysis is accurate for all implementations.
  4. Code Structure:
    • The code is well-organized with proper class and method separation.
    • Comments are generally helpful and explain the logic.

Areas for Improvement:

  1. Error Handling:
    • In the stack implementations, returning 0 for underflow might be ambiguous (what if 0 is a valid stack element?). Consider throwing an exception instead.
  2. Code Duplication:
    • The underflow message is duplicated in pop() and peek() methods. Could be extracted to a helper method.
  3. Linked List Implementation:
    • The insert() method takes and returns a LinkedList instance, which is unnecessary since it modifies the list in place. Could be void.
  4. Naming Conventions:
    • Variable names like 'a' in the array-based stack could be more descriptive (e.g., 'stackArray').
  5. Edge Cases:
    • The linked list implementation could benefit from handling null list input in insert() and printList() methods.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants