Skip to content

test: add Expo compatibility CI job #1432

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

grdsdev
Copy link
Contributor

@grdsdev grdsdev commented May 27, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...

What is the current behavior?

Please link any relevant issues here.

What is the new behavior?

Feel free to include screenshots if it includes visual changes.

Additional context

Add any other context or screenshots.

Copy link

snyk-io bot commented May 27, 2025

Snyk checks have failed. 1 issues have been found so far.

Icon Severity Issues
Critical 0
High 1
Medium 0
Low 0

code/snyk check is complete. 1 issues have been found. (View Details)

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.


const SUPABASE_URL = 'http://127.0.0.1:54321'
const ANON_KEY =
'eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJzdXBhYmFzZS1kZW1vIiwicm9sZSI6ImFub24iLCJleHAiOjE5ODM4MTI5OTZ9.CRXP1A7WOeoJeXxjNni43kdQwgnWNReilDMblYTn_I0'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  Hardcoded Secret

Avoid hardcoding values that are meant to be secret. Found a hardcoded string used in here.

Line 7 | CWE-547 | Priority score 775
Data flow: 2 steps

Step 1 - 2

'eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJzdXBhYmFzZS1kZW1vIiwicm9sZSI6ImFub24iLCJleHAiOjE5ODM4MTI5OTZ9.CRXP1A7WOeoJeXxjNni43kdQwgnWNReilDMblYTn_I0'

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 27, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 15442875159

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 72.889%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 15440080331: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 109
Relevant Lines: 132

💛 - Coveralls

@grdsdev grdsdev force-pushed the guilherme/expo-compatibility-test branch 2 times, most recently from c4d6d35 to b17a9e2 Compare June 3, 2025 10:47
@grdsdev grdsdev force-pushed the guilherme/expo-compatibility-test branch from b17a9e2 to 764777a Compare June 3, 2025 11:52
@grdsdev grdsdev force-pushed the guilherme/expo-compatibility-test branch from 764777a to b63febb Compare June 4, 2025 11:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants