-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Update tool.py to include **kwargs #7918
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks so much @ButterflyAtHeart ! Is
continue
the right thing to do here?I think the right thing to do might be more like "find the name of the kwargs argument" and then "wrap the non-matching arguments into a dict with that kwargs name".
Maybe we need to test this with a real function that takes
**kwargs
as inputs and describes those kwargs in the docstring.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue with checking for a kwargs argument is that needs to happen before the loop, because
kwargs["kwargs"]
doesn't necessarily exist so changing the dictionarykwargs
while iterating raises an error. This would add quite a lot of code. I think continue is a more elegant solution as it just says we do not need to do any further tests for this keyword argument. Maybe adding a comment there beforecontinue
would be good. So if you agree we should stick with continue I would add this comment.Here is the test I have used to test this:
If you think there need to be any other cases included into the test. Please let me now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ButterflyAtHeart Should we make sure the insufficient arguments are detected?