Skip to content

Conversation

@tommartensen
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Applied the changes established in stackrox/stackrox#17517 to the collector pipelines.

Checklist

  • Investigated and inspected CI test results
  • Updated documentation accordingly

Automated testing

  • Added unit tests
  • Added integration tests
  • Added regression tests

If any of these don't apply, please comment below.

Testing Performed

Konflux testing sufficient.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 29, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 27.60%. Comparing base (2ff6971) to head (7bc272a).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2634   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   27.60%   27.60%           
=======================================
  Files          95       95           
  Lines        5422     5422           
  Branches     2523     2523           
=======================================
  Hits         1497     1497           
  Misses       3213     3213           
  Partials      712      712           
Flag Coverage Δ
collector-unit-tests 27.60% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tommartensen tommartensen marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2025 16:37
@tommartensen tommartensen requested review from a team and rhacs-bot as code owners October 29, 2025 16:37
@tommartensen tommartensen enabled auto-merge (squash) October 29, 2025 17:00
@tommartensen tommartensen requested a review from msugakov October 30, 2025 07:59
Copy link
Contributor

@msugakov msugakov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GitHub shows there's a merge conflict to resolve which won't let this PR get auto-merged so not approving yet.

Overall, looks good but I have a non-blocking question for a follow-up or a throw-away PR.

type: array
description: Additional labels to put on the built containers.
- default:
- linux-c2xlarge/amd64
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at the build time, linux-c2xlarge/amd64 is a reasonable choice, though I wonder if linux-cxlarge/amd64 would do just as well. Do you mind running a build with it to see if the build duration remains the same?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll try. With linux-c2xlarge the build time was between 23-25 minutes (for amd64 and arm64).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

@msugakov msugakov Oct 30, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants