Skip to content

refac(mariadb): Use new WaitHelper for waiters#7278

Open
Fyusel wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
mariadb-refac-waithandler
Open

refac(mariadb): Use new WaitHelper for waiters#7278
Fyusel wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
mariadb-refac-waithandler

Conversation

@Fyusel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Fyusel Fyusel commented May 15, 2026

STACKITSDK-380

Description

Checklist

  • Issue was linked above
  • No generated code was adjusted manually (check comments in file header)
  • Changelogs
    • Changelog in the root directory was adjusted (see here)
    • Changelog(s) of the service(s) were adjusted (see e.g. here)
  • VERSION file(s) of the service(s) were adjusted
  • Code format was applied: make fmt
  • Examples were added / adjusted (see examples/ directory)
  • Unit tests got implemented or updated
  • Unit tests are passing: make test (will be checked by CI)
  • No linter issues: make lint (will be checked by CI)

@Fyusel Fyusel requested a review from a team as a code owner May 15, 2026 07:45
@Fyusel Fyusel force-pushed the mariadb-refac-waithandler branch from a3732ec to 3fc46c3 Compare May 15, 2026 07:46
@Fyusel Fyusel changed the title refec(mariadb): Use new WaitHelper for waiters refac(mariadb): Use new WaitHelper for waiters May 15, 2026
@Fyusel Fyusel force-pushed the mariadb-refac-waithandler branch 2 times, most recently from c183494 to 1ab0465 Compare May 18, 2026 08:54
cgoetz-inovex
cgoetz-inovex previously approved these changes May 18, 2026
Comment on lines -80 to -81
if strings.Contains(s.LastOperation.Description, "DeleteFailed") || strings.Contains(s.LastOperation.Description, "failed") {
return true, nil, fmt.Errorf("instance was deleted successfully but has errors: %s", s.LastOperation.Description)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we keep this behaviour?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, we should keep it in my opinion. Thanks! Saw that in my other PR but forgot this here 🙈

@Fyusel Fyusel force-pushed the mariadb-refac-waithandler branch 2 times, most recently from 3226d1c to 605ae16 Compare May 18, 2026 10:19
STACKITSDK-380

Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahmen <alexander.dahmen@inovex.de>
@Fyusel Fyusel force-pushed the mariadb-refac-waithandler branch from 605ae16 to 5898798 Compare May 18, 2026 10:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants