Skip to content

Backport Specification.unrestricted() from main branch. #3941

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

r-gruber
Copy link

This would allow 3.5 users to rework their code ahead of the 4.0 release. 'where(null)' was deprecated and should be replaced with unrestricted()

  • You have read the Spring Data contribution guidelines.
  • You use the code formatters provided here and have them applied to your changes. Don’t submit any formatting related changes.
  • You submit test cases (unit or integration tests) that back your changes.
  • You added yourself as author in the headers of the classes you touched. Amend the date range in the Apache license header if needed. For new types, add the license header (copy from another file and set the current year only).

This would allow 3.5 users to rework their code ahead of the 4.0 release. 'where(null)' was deprecated and should be replaced with unrestricted()

Signed-off-by: Robert Gruber <[email protected]>
@r-gruber r-gruber force-pushed the backport_unrestricted branch from ea95a61 to 0f0088e Compare July 14, 2025 09:01
@mp911de mp911de added status: superseded An issue that has been superseded by another and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Jul 14, 2025
@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Jul 14, 2025

Thank you for your contribution. I've missed that you've already submitted a pull request and so I handled the backport through #3942.

@mp911de mp911de closed this Jul 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: superseded An issue that has been superseded by another
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants