-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
env: detect the lowerdir overlay mount options at runtime #1192
Open
davvid
wants to merge
1
commit into
spkenv:main
Choose a base branch
from
davvid:detect-mount-options
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Slightly related -- one observation is that
break_hardlinks
is alwaystrue
yetto_options()
has behavior that checks whether it'sfalse
(which can never happen).In an earlier iteration I was looking at whether we can toggle all of these bools, not just
lowerdir_append
, insidequery()
so thatto_options()
can be simplified. The rationale was to avoid having to query theparams
hashset in bothquery()
andto_options()
so that we can do it just once insidequery()
.This is the check inside of
to_options()
that I'm referring to:This seems like dead code because
break_hardlinks
is neverfalse
. I figured that maybe this was left this way for possible future changes where some other component might be togglingbreak_hardlinks
, but I just wanted to point this out in case this is something that was an oversight that needs some cleanup to remove thebreak_hardlinks
bool.In any case, let me know if we think that adjusting more of these bools inside of
query()
with the goal of simplifyingto_options()
and removing the call tolet params = runtime::overlayfs::overlayfs_available_options();
is worth doing.This PR is currently a minimal but slightly less efficient approach. If we did want to toggle these other bools inside of
query()
, and/or cleanup thebreak_hardlinks
bools, then that could be a separate follow-up PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIRC the break_hardlinks was something that I had working and either it didn't work the way that I thought or there was some adjustment that we made to the logic which has orphaned it as you note. Definitely worth looking into as a separate effort