Skip to content

Conversation

jopejoe1
Copy link
Contributor

@jopejoe1 jopejoe1 commented Oct 9, 2025

Fixes #2827

@jlovejoy
Copy link
Member

@jopejoe1 - did you copy all the existing markup from MIT in the xml file? It looks like it

We don't usually do this. Although, its sort of begs the question of whether we ought to consider it. Generally, we don't add markup, unless variations are actually found, rather than being pre-emptive. Not sure if that may be the case with this variant??

@swinslow - thoughts on this scenario?

@jlovejoy jlovejoy added this to the 3.28.0 milestone Oct 12, 2025
@jopejoe1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Indeed, I just copied the MIT license markup and then modified it to match this license.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

New license request: MIT-STK [SPDX-Online-Tools]

2 participants