Skip to content

fix(scheduler): adjust yield timing logic to improve task scheduling … #2483

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maeema
Copy link

@maeema maeema commented May 18, 2025

Summary:

This PR fixes a bug related to the maxDeadline timing in the scheduler, improving yield behavior. It also removes the unused hasTimeRemaining boolean parameter from flushWork, workLoop, and the scheduledCallback function, resulting in cleaner and easier-to-maintain code.

Details:

  • Corrected the comparison with maxDeadline in shouldYieldToHost to ensure the scheduler yields control correctly and timely.

  • Removed the unused hasTimeRemaining parameter from core scheduler functions, simplifying the code base

  • No new functionality added — purely a bug fix and code cleanup

…accuracy

- Added maxDeadline to handle max yield interval timing correctly
- Updated shouldYieldToHost logic to consider maxDeadline for better responsiveness
- Fixed parameter types and signatures for consistency
- Minor refactoring for clarity without changing core behavior
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 18, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: c7e25b1

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant