feat: added getMinimumBalanceForRentExemption with no network call
#10
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 3c46c8a The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 2 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
obtaining the minimum value for rent exception is most commonly obtained from the
getMinimumBalanceForRentExemptionrpc method, which results in a network call and therefore slowerSummary of Changes
add a sync
getMinimumBalanceForRentExemptionfunction to perform the math required to calculate the min rent exempt valueNote: there is a trade off here we are making in that IF/WHEN the min rent value is changed or made dynamic, this calculation would become invalid. This should be acceptable for the foreseeable future since this type of change would require a SIMD and have a long rollout time, allowing ample time to adjust this function