-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 385
Testing Double Checkout as Possible Solution to Review App Deployment from Comment Bug #638
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThis set of changes updates several areas across the codebase and CI/CD configuration. The Footer component's hyperlink text is revised for clarity. Debugging commands are removed from the Dockerfile to streamline the build process. In GitHub Actions, a Git command is removed from the Docker image build step, and environment variable handling is improved in the workflow for removing stale review apps. The workflow for deploying review apps is updated to use more explicit and restrictive trigger conditions for pull request and push events. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GitHub
participant Workflow
User->>GitHub: Opens/updates PR or pushes to branch (not main/master)
GitHub->>Workflow: Triggers deploy-to-control-plane-review-app workflow
Workflow->>Workflow: Executes steps based on event type and branch
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Hi 👋 Here are the commands available for this PR:
Use |
🚀 Quick Review App CommandsWelcome! Here are the commands you can use in this PR:
|
/deploy-review-app |
✅ Deployment complete for PR #638, commit 7b05d8d |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.controlplane/Dockerfile
(0 hunks).github/actions/build-docker-image/action.yml
(0 hunks).github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-staging.yml
(1 hunks).github/workflows/nightly-remove-stale-review-apps.yml
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- .controlplane/Dockerfile
- .github/actions/build-docker-image/action.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test (22.x, 3.3.4)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/nightly-remove-stale-review-apps.yml (1)
19-21
: Explicitly pass token and org tosetup-environment
step
By movingCPLN_TOKEN_STAGING
andCPLN_ORG_STAGING
into thewith:
block, you limit their scope to just this action, which is more secure than setting them globally. Please verify that the secretCPLN_TOKEN_STAGING
and repository variableCPLN_ORG_STAGING
exist and are spelled correctly..github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-staging.yml (1)
8-9
: Trigger on specific pull request events
Limiting the workflow toopened
,synchronize
, andreopened
PR events helps avoid unnecessary runs on status updates or other PR activities. This is a good practice.
- '**' # Any branch | ||
- '!main' # Except main | ||
- '!master' # Except master |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Invalid branch exclusion syntax in push.branches
GitHub Actions does not support negation patterns (!main
, !master
) under branches
. Use branches-ignore
to exclude branches.
-push:
- branches:
- - '**'
- - '!main'
- - '!master'
+push:
+ branches:
+ - '**'
+ branches-ignore:
+ - main
+ - master
✅ Deployment complete for PR #638, commit e3afd61 |
✅ Deployment complete for PR #638, commit e3afd61 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review-app.yml (2)
5-5
: Clarify the workflow trigger comment
Consider expanding this comment to specify the exact events (pull_request
,push
,issue_comment
,workflow_dispatch
) governed by theon:
block for better readability.
9-13
: Simplify branch filtering usingbranches-ignore
Instead of including all branches with'**'
and negations, you could leveragebranches-ignore
for clarity:- push: - branches: - - '**' - - '!main' - - '!master' + push: + branches-ignore: + - main + - masterThis uses the built-in exclusion mechanism and reduces pattern complexity.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review-app.yml
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: deploy
- GitHub Check: deploy
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review-app.yml (1)
7-8
: Restrict PR triggers to key actions
You’ve limitedpull_request
toopened
,synchronize
, andreopened
, which avoids extraneous deployments. Verify this aligns with your use case (e.g., if you need to deploy on draft-to-ready transitions, consider addingready_for_review
).
✅ Deployment complete for PR #638, commit 1fa421a |
This change is
Summary by CodeRabbit
Style
Chores