Dear Shadow,
in this commit df674fe an imu description was added to the URDF, following the sensor description of URDF, probably this one https://wiki.ros.org/urdf/XML/sensor which is no really "supported". Do you use your own parser ?
however, sensor parsing in URDF is broken for ages now, and we maintain a PR that fixes it (but it still did not get merged) following some newer way (more advanced, to support more types of sensors). see ros/urdf#5 and ros/urdfdom#84
that follows this sensor description proposal https://wiki.ros.org/urdf/XML/sensor/proposals in which "type" is a required field .
At our side your addition now obviously fails to parse, because the type is missing.
[ERROR] No child element defining the sensor.
Would it be harmful to add this field (I can provide a PR) so that your description becomes compatible with this new URDF parser we suggest (hence supporting us in that quest). It will help describe the sensor better.
Dear Shadow,
in this commit df674fe an imu description was added to the URDF, following the sensor description of URDF, probably this one https://wiki.ros.org/urdf/XML/sensor which is no really "supported". Do you use your own parser ?
however, sensor parsing in URDF is broken for ages now, and we maintain a PR that fixes it (but it still did not get merged) following some newer way (more advanced, to support more types of sensors). see ros/urdf#5 and ros/urdfdom#84
that follows this sensor description proposal https://wiki.ros.org/urdf/XML/sensor/proposals in which "type" is a required field .
At our side your addition now obviously fails to parse, because the type is missing.
[ERROR] No child element defining the sensor.Would it be harmful to add this field (I can provide a PR) so that your description becomes compatible with this new URDF parser we suggest (hence supporting us in that quest). It will help describe the sensor better.