Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 10, 2023. It is now read-only.

armv7 support #234

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2016
Merged

armv7 support #234

merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2016

Conversation

fabricedesre
Copy link
Contributor

This change is Reviewable

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Contributor

Ugh serde-deprecated/quasi#35

@fabricedesre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not sure what's going on with the appveyor failure... any idea @frewsxcv ?

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Contributor

frewsxcv commented May 5, 2016

I'm not too familiar with Appveyor. I'm going to cc @larsbergstrom since they have more experienced with Appveyor and Windows in general.

@fabricedesre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Well it seems that appveyor was never really set up properly. See for instance the same failure in #235 that landed.

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented May 5, 2016

Oh yeah, I stalled on #230. I'll turn it off.

@fabricedesre
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jdm so woh can review this one?

@larsbergstrom
Copy link
Contributor

I'm fine with this if you squash.

@bors-servo delegate+

@bors-servo
Copy link

✌️ @fabricedesre can now approve this pull request

@fabricedesre
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors-servo: r=larsbergstrom

@bors-servo
Copy link

📌 Commit fccec9a has been approved by larsbergstrom

@bors-servo
Copy link

⌛ Testing commit fccec9a with merge 0a44672...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2016
armv7 support

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/rust-layers/234)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link

☀️ Test successful - travis

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit fccec9a into servo:master May 5, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants