Integrated Warrify (and improved alignments) #206
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closes #204 Signed-off-by: Jean-Baptiste Bianchi <[email protected]>
ricardozanini
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2024
|
@JBBianchi GH is telling me there are conflicts. Can you check? |
Signed-off-by: Jean-Baptiste Bianchi <[email protected]>
Should be fixed |
JBBianchi
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Many thanks for submitting your Pull Request ❤️!
What this PR does / why we need it:
Integrated Warrify as an adopter and optimized layout.
Closes #204
Special notes for reviewers:
I restricted the logos on their height rather than their width to have a better alignment and prevent this:
vs
Additional information (if needed):