Skip to content

Conversation

@anurag4DSB
Copy link
Contributor

Add rate-limit actions to action map

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 71.42%. Comparing base (7de5056) to head (4269f0b).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on development/8.2.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           development/8.2    #2570   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            71.41%   71.42%           
================================================
  Files                  222      222           
  Lines                17851    17852    +1     
  Branches              3689     3713   +24     
================================================
+ Hits                 12749    12750    +1     
  Misses                5098     5098           
  Partials                 4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@anurag4DSB anurag4DSB requested a review from a team November 10, 2025 20:14
@tmacro tmacro force-pushed the improvement/ARSN-529/rate_limit_config_model branch 3 times, most recently from 4ba5165 to 7de5056 Compare November 12, 2025 18:39
Base automatically changed from improvement/ARSN-529/rate_limit_config_model to development/8.2 November 14, 2025 16:12
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Nov 14, 2025

Hello anurag4dsb,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Nov 14, 2025

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue ARSN-530 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 8.2.38

  • 8.3.0

  • 8.4.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of ARSN-530, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@anurag4DSB anurag4DSB force-pushed the feature/ARSN-530-add-new-actions-for-permissions branch from 551fd68 to 49999cd Compare November 14, 2025 16:16
@anurag4DSB
Copy link
Contributor Author

ping

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Nov 14, 2025

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

@anurag4DSB
Copy link
Contributor Author

/create_integration_branches

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Nov 14, 2025

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/6.4
  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.1

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Nov 14, 2025

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@anurag4DSB
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Nov 14, 2025

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/8.2

  • ✔️ development/8.3

  • ✔️ development/8.4

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/6.4
  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.1

Please check the status of the associated issue ARSN-530.

Goodbye anurag4dsb.

The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches

@bert-e bert-e merged commit 4269f0b into development/8.2 Nov 14, 2025
7 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the feature/ARSN-530-add-new-actions-for-permissions branch November 14, 2025 16:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants