Repository navigation
blog: Veeam with RustFS — S3 backup and restore validation - #163
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Document the end-to-end validation of RustFS as a Veeam backup repository: repository registration over HTTPS, agent enrollment, 87.4 GB entire-computer backup with zero errors, and file-level restore verification. Covers the Community Edition license gate for object storage backup and the SOSAPI capacity reporting status (rustfs#1511, PR rustfs#9007).
Contributor
|
@majinghe is attempting to deploy a commit to the overtrue's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
Correct licensing, retention, access-mode, UAC and metric claims. Add contextual product links and official references, use a raster social cover, and compress the validation screenshots. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Add “Veeam with RustFS: S3 Backup and Restore Validation” at
/blog/veeam-backup-replication-with-rustfs/, documenting the author's Windows Agent backup and file-recovery experiment with VBR 13.1.2.57 and RustFS 1.0.1.The post covers repository setup, the enterprise-license gate, Agent enrollment, measured job results, file recovery, and SOSAPI capacity-reporting status. The correction keeps the experiment's useful evidence without presenting it as Veeam Ready certification, a throughput benchmark, automatic immutability, or universal workload compatibility.
Scope is limited to the article and its images. No blog renderer, product pages, dependencies, layout, or styling are changed. The slug is unchanged. Rollback is a revert of the correction commit; no data or runtime configuration migration is involved.
Validation
pnpm run lint— passed.pnpm exec tsc --noEmit— passed.pnpm run build— passed; 79 static pages generated and sitemap validation passed with 57 URLs.git diff --checkandgit diff --cached --check— passed.The first build attempt rejected a shared external node_modules symlink. Locked dependencies were then restored inside the isolated checkout with
CI=true pnpm install --frozen-lockfile, and the required pnpm checks passed without manifest or lockfile changes.Two sequential adversarial passes were completed:
The original Windows/S3 experiment was not rerun during this documentation correction. Backup numbers and the original-file comparison remain attributed to the author's lab report, not newly measured results.
Screenshots
The existing SVG design source is retained with corrected lab wording. The frontmatter uses its PNG export for social sharing. Four real validation screenshots are preserved as WebP: repository wizard (immutability unchecked), repository list (S3-compatible, Direct, 64 GB Used Space), backup success, and one-file restore completion.