Skip to content

Conversation

@madsmtm
Copy link
Member

@madsmtm madsmtm commented Nov 24, 2025

It should be enough to verify that the code compiles, we're testing it elsewhere, and we don't need development dependencies to follow MSRV.

Semi alternative to #260 (since after this, I suspect we're gonna run into much fewer problems with MSRV breaking CI).

@madsmtm madsmtm added the github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code label Nov 24, 2025
@madsmtm madsmtm force-pushed the madsmtm/msrv-ci branch 2 times, most recently from ad207fd to ea80ded Compare November 24, 2025 11:17
@madsmtm madsmtm changed the title Only run cargo check for MSRV CI: Only run cargo check for MSRV Nov 24, 2025
@madsmtm madsmtm force-pushed the madsmtm/msrv-ci branch 6 times, most recently from 31dd4ed to 8264ef9 Compare November 24, 2025 11:30
@MarijnS95
Copy link
Member

Semi alternative to #260

The main goal is to make sure we at least check our minimum version bounds in CI. It was only last weekend that a crate was depending on objc2 framework crates 0.3 and removed unsafe {} wrappers without bumping the requirement to 0.3.2, breaking folks on older or tracked lockfiles.

@madsmtm madsmtm force-pushed the madsmtm/msrv-ci branch 2 times, most recently from 3679f50 to 0ecab92 Compare November 24, 2025 11:38
It should be enough to verify that the code compiles, we're testing it
elsewhere, and we don't need development dependencies to follow MSRV.
@madsmtm
Copy link
Member Author

madsmtm commented Dec 10, 2025

I've merged #260 and rebased this op top of it

@madsmtm madsmtm merged commit d46fcf5 into master Dec 13, 2025
40 checks passed
@madsmtm madsmtm deleted the madsmtm/msrv-ci branch December 13, 2025 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants