Skip to content

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Jules-Bertholet and others added 12 commits March 30, 2022 13:49
…consts-from-trait-impls, r=jsha

rustdoc: Only show associated consts from inherent impls in sidebar

Resolves rust-lang#95459
ptr_metadata test: avoid ptr-to-int transmutes

Pointers can have provenance, integers don't, so transmuting pointers to integers creates "non-standard" values and it is unclear how well those can be supported (rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines#286).

So for this test let's take the safer option and use a pointer type instead. That also makes Miri happy. :)
skip slow int_log tests in Miri

Iterating over i16::MAX many things takes a long time in Miri, let's not do that.
I added rust-lang/miri#2044 on the Miri side to still give us some test coverage.
expand: Do not count metavar declarations on RHS of `macro_rules`

They are 0 by definition there.

Addresses rust-lang#95425 (comment)
r? ```@nnethercote```
make utf8_char_counts test faster in Miri

This currently takes >3min on GHA, so let's reduce the test size a bit more for Miri.
…n-docs, r=Amanieu

add notes about alignment-altering reallocations to Allocator docs

As I said in rust-lang/wg-allocators#97, the fact that calls to `grow`, `grow_zeroed`, and `shrink` may request altered alignments is surprising and may be a pitfall for implementors of `Allocator` if it's left implicit. This pull request adds a note to the "Safety" section of each function's docs making it explicit.
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Apr 1, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=6

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 1, 2022

📌 Commit a92286f has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Apr 1, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 1, 2022

⌛ Testing commit a92286f with merge 99da9ae...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 1, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 99da9ae to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 1, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 99da9ae into rust-lang:master Apr 1, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.61.0 milestone Apr 1, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (99da9ae): comparison url.

Summary:

  • Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found
  • Secondary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
Regressions 😿
(primary)
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
All 😿 🎉
(primary)
count1 0 0 13 0 13
mean2 N/A N/A -55.5% N/A -55.5%
max N/A N/A -79.2% N/A 0.0%

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. number of relevant changes

  2. the arithmetic mean of the percent change

@rylev
Copy link
Member

rylev commented Apr 5, 2022

FYI for anyone falling along, the above performance improvements are not real. There was a change to one of the performance benchmarks that made all compilations of that benchmark take roughly half the time compared to the previous run. This rollup is performance neutral.

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-vpmk7t8 branch July 30, 2022 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants